I strongly oppose this proposed rule. Having managed my own investments for years, I am well aware of the dangers and potential benefits of leveraged and inverse funds. They have been an important part of my investment portfolio for years. I choose to manage my own risk subject to my own investing objectives, and deeply oppose the government regulators trying to manage them for me and others
Comments:
Regarding inverse and leveraged ETFs: I feel they both are important tools for retail traders, especially novice traders inexperienced with traditional short-selling and options.
Many novice traders lose in the market because they only know how to play it one direction, I.E. buy low sell high. They either don't understand, are intimidated by, or don't want/have the
Regarding L&I funds and potentially restricting access to them... I would oppose any such move.
Firstly, my current brokers (TDAmeritrade, E*Trade Financial, and Charles Schwab & Co, Inc) all provide me with ample educational materials online at no charge which informs me of the risks and limitations involved in trading L&I products, namely, they are intended
SUGGESTED ROUTING
Senior Management
Legal & Compliance
Operations
Systems
Trading
Executive Summary
The National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. (NASD®) has been reviewing member firm compliance with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Order Handling Rules and with Nasdaq® trading rules. We are taking this opportunity to reemphasize the application
I partially trade with a US broker in order to have more access and freedom in my choice of investment vehicles. Making 'complex' funds only freely accessible to the elite and exorbitantly rich (like in the EU), whilst creating more and more hoops for regular people, will only limit opportunities for regular smaller investors. I should have the freedom to do with my own money as I wish
You not regulators should be able to choose the public investments that are right for you and your family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. It is very important that you express your views in your own wordsyour comments are more likely to be taken seriously by FINRA if they reflect your own experience and perspective. Not only do you have the
September 2005
In a continuing effort to assist member firms' compliance efforts, NASD is issuing this regular communication, "Improving Examination Results." This document has two sections: "Examination Priorities" and "Frequently Found Violations," both of which relate to the Department of Member Regulation's routine examinations of firms. While each
SUGGESTED ROUTING:*
Senior ManagementInternal AuditLegal & ComplianceOperationsSystems*These are suggested departments only. Others may be appropriate for your firm.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
On November 24, 1992, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced the adoption of amendments to its Net Capital Rule, Rule 15c3-1 (Rule). Except for the minimum increases scheduled to
REQUEST FOR COMMENT
Proposed Rule Governing Allocations and Distributions of Shares in Initial Public Offerings (IPOs)
Comment Period Expires: January 9, 2004
SUGGESTED ROUTING
KEY TOPICS
Corporate Financing
Legal & Compliance
Senior Management
Trading & Market Making
IPO Allocations
IPO Pricing
Rule 2710
I am in support of FINRA being in control of the short interest compilation and most fine grained dissemination. I am in support of the most extreme reporting conditions. Reporting should be daily, there is too much time for them to change their books. There is also zero reason they can't report their holdings daily, they have computers, it's not like they actually do anything without
