I am opposed to regulation #22-08.
I should be able to make my own decisions about my investments, not regulators. I can read & understand the notices that are provided when I choose an investment and should not be required to take a test to prove it.
I use inverse funds as well as other instruments and it will be detrimental to my portfolio if I am unable to use them.
I ask that
I resent the fact that you're considering a net worth test before I'm allowed to continue to use certain leveraged or inverse ETFs. Such products allow the average investor - perhaps someone that wouldn't be considered "high net worth" - to responsibly hedge against certain eventualities. If you allow hedge fund managers to do so, why shouldn'
I not regulators should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. Ishouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before you can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds
We should be able to invest in the public investments that are right for us -- not have the government decide for us. We should not have to go through special processes or pass a test. Regulators, please do not impose these measures on us. Investing is a way for middle class folks to build intergenerational wealth and if you choose to put these restrictions in place you are only hurting the
I am opposed to regulation #22-08.
I should be about to make my own decisions about my investments, not regulators. I can read & understand the notices that are provided when I choose an investment and should not be required to take a test to prove it.
I use inverse funds as well as other instruments and it will be detrimental to my portfolio if I am unable to use them.
I ask that
I am opposed to regulation #22-08.
I should be about to make my own decisions about my investments, not regulators. Nor should I be required to take tests to prove myself. I can read & understand the notices that are provided when I choose an investment. They are plenty sufficient.
Some of the funds that are planned to be limited, like inverse funds, are critical to my investment
Leverage ETF is like a high growth stock. It makes no sense to require investment to pass a test to trade or even hold the leverage ETF.
Netflix (NFLX) is a good example of a high growth stock. It was one of the best performing stocks for over 2 decades, but in just 5 short months, it drops from $700.99 on 11/7/2021 to $199.87 today's closing (5/3/2022) or down over 70%.
I should be able to choose the public
investments that are right for you and your family.
Public investments should be available to all of the public,
not just the privileged.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process
like passing a test before you can invest in public securities,
like leveraged and inverse funds.
Leveraged and inverse funds are important to
This rule should not be allowed to pass. It further infringes upon retail investors rights and access to free and fair markets. By limiting access to markets by tests that traders must pass or limiting to high wealth individuals is discrimination against all investors in a free market. This discrimination against the people who have 401k, ira, investments only will surve to hurt the people not
I feel that I have the right as a human being to invest anyway I like and in my family's best interest without the consent of a regulator I also feel that I have the right not to go to the school to take tests or any of that other nonsense I can understand the information just fine the way it's written now to be able to handle myself in any investment situation thank you very much
