Inverse Leveraged ETFs are a good way to hedge fixed income investments. I invested in the TBT leveraged ETF to offset losses in my bond investments due to interest rate hikes. Why should I lose my right to invest in a product that protects the value of my investments simply because some investors are too stupid to understand the product they are buying.
To Whom it May Concern,
Do not remove or hamper my ability to utilize any means of investing that I deem to be to my best interest. Regulating individuals simply strengthens large investors at the expense of small investors. Leveraged funds can be used to hedge in times of financial uncertainty. There are already adequate disclaimers about the risks involved with leveraged funds available.
I oppose any restrictions to freely trade public securities as I believe it is a limitation on my freedom to choose how I want to invest my money and the choices I have. This is a free market enterprise and it should remain so in order that all including myself can and will continue to benefit in the short, medium and long-term. I hope our voices are heard before a decision is made, as otherwise
My comments submissions are: 1. The purpose of this change is to improve transparency within the market to counter fraudulently or bad actors having the ability to circumvent reporting mechanisms for their own gain, and often the loss that retail investors suffer as a result when operating within the market. This premise should underpin how all comments are reviewed and revisions incorporated. 2
Where do I begin? Crack out the whip on SEC forcing them to actually enforce the current rules, & make improvements where needed to protect EVERY investor - NO FAVORITISM. Shorts should be transparent for ALL to see. 'Immediate' enforcement of FTD failure to deliver. FULL transparency is imperative, show what's happening on the inside with dark pools. A fair market needs to
I'm opposed to the Nanny State and attempts to stop me from investing how I like. Leveraged and inverse funds are an interesting component to a diverse portfolio. Removing these would only handicap individual investors, which is not fair. They can be used along side unleveraged standard ETF's to enhance performance or hedge during time of high volatility. They are excellent
I am opposed to further regulations to restrict or disqualify me from trading L&I Funds. I am aware of the high risk and short term volatility to valuations of these funds and the need for daily if not hourly monitoring and evaluation.
My brokerage firm, Fidelity, already provides a popup warning statement for me on these funds and it has been effective in causing second thoughts and
I have found leveraged and inverse ETFs to be extremely valuable in managing the risk in my personal portfolio without having to try to do so by shorting stocks, which carries significantly more risk. There are plenty of warnings and disclaimers when buying these securities, or even reviewing them, to alert investors of the risks. It would be detrimental to my investment strategy if access to
Hello,
Please do not take away my ability to continue holding TQQQ as an investment. I have allocated a portion of my portfolio to holding TQQQ long-term. I am OK with a short test requirement to make sure people know what they're doing with leveraged ETFs like TQQQ. People shouldn't take on risks they don't understand. But please do not take away my ability to
I think when it comes to FTD's and naked shorting that the fines and punishments should be much more than what the companies failing are making in profit. These companies should be held accountable and have assets liquidated if they do not cover FTD's. Settlement periods should be removed. It shouldn't be a T+2 system. How is it fair to the retail investor when it dates days for us
