I believe its governments business to stay out of my business. People who know how to invest should not be hampered with. I oppose FINRAs authority to regulate my investment decisions. I've invested in public securities in the past and don't believe I have to go through a process or test to be approved to invest or day trade.
Dear Sir or Madam,
I am sending this email in support of retaining the right and ability to invest in leveraged and inverse funds.
No one should enforce limitations to our trading capabilities in such ETFs. I should not be submitted to any testing or financial stratification before I am able to proceed with such trades.
Please update me regarding the progress of this issue.
The proposed regulations would unnecessarily infringe on my freedoms to contract privately on financial matters based on my own discretion. Leveraged and inverse funds are an important component of my trading strategies, and I should not have to disclose or satisfy any particular financial means or investment knowledge tests to enter into financial transactions in these products.
I OPPOSE RESTRICTIONS TO MY RIGHT TO INVEST. I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test. I am capable of understanding the investments considered and their risks.
I should be able to choose my own investments without an added burden of the new rules you are considering. My broker already has my investment background and experience, so no federal survey is needed. A test is an especially onerous requirement. It is already clear when purchasing a leveraged or inverse fund what the risks are.
I oppose the proposed Rule#S7-24-15 for the following reasons: 1. You have no right to decide for the public into what vehicle the public can invest their own funds. 2. You have no right to decide which individuals are allowed the right to invest. 3. You are creating a discriminatory system for investors decided by agencies on what is available. You are basically creating a secret system
I strongly oppose any attempt to limit the right to invest in products identified as leveraged, inverse or other investments designed to seek enhanced returns.
These investment products should not just be limited to "privileged" parties but should remain in the public domain available to all investors.
ANY means tests to purchase or invest in these funds should not be required.
I think this is [REDACTED]. I should be able to invest my money were I chose. I am the one taking the risks. They need to keep their hand out of my public right to do this. If I wanted to go to school and pass tests to invest. I can make those choices for myself. Don't make any changes. This sounds like [REDACTED]
I am competent to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. I should not have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities like leveraged and inverse funds. I am capable of understanding these funds and their risks and I do not need regulators to impose restrictions on me.
Leveraged and inverse funds are important to my
investment strategies. I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before you can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I am
capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds
and their risks. I do not need these measures imposed on me!
