Investors should be able to choose what public investments are right for them and investors should not be unreasonably restricted by various tests and hurdles before investing . There should however be warnings messages in plain language for certain funds that have high risk. Warnings, however, should not be road blocks. I do invest in inverse and leveraged funds and understand their risks.
Dear Sir,
I do not want my rights to invest impeded or impinged upon by this legislation. I do not want to suffer through cooling off periods where I can not invest or arbitrary finance or investment limits placed on my investment habits nor forced education and testing standards placed on me as the investor.
Thank you,
R Beliles
This is poorly conceived. I should be the sole determiner of what I invest my funds in. There is NO LEGITIMATE REASON to regulate my ability to invest in whatever legal assets I choose. I do not need to pass a test, get 3rd party approval or regulatory approval to decide what to invest my own funds in.
Hands off my investment decisions!!!
I not regulators should be able to choose the public
investments that are right for me. Public investments should be available to all of the public.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process
like passing a test before you can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I am
capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds
and their risks
I like to invest in leveraged funds. They add a great advantage to my investment objectives. I dont want regulators restricting my access to them as I understand the financial markets and I dont want to take tests to gain access to them. I have been using leveraged funds for ten years now and they have been an important part of my portfolio.
I, not regulators, should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before you can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I understand leveraged and inverse funds and their risks.
I can pick my own investments, my money not regulators. I am capable of understanding the risk of my investments and do not need to take a course or pass a test to buy leveraged or inverse funds or ETF's. Leverage and inverse funds are important tools to help hedge the risk and create large profit opportunities in both up and down markets.
I want to make my choose of public investments and those investments should be available to all and not just the privileged. There shouldn't be any test before investing in public securities which include leveraged and inverse funds. I am full capable of understand all the risks when I invest in leverage and inverse funds and I do not need measure to be imposed on me.
To Whom It May Concern,
I am commenting to oppose the proposed restrictions.
As an average long-term investor, I normally use leveraged and inverse funds to protect my investments. I believe that I have gained knowledge of the benefits and risks of investing these funds. I believe that I should be able to determine if I should invest to these funds by myself, without having to passing certain
We should have the right to invest in whatever asset we choose without these type of restrictions by FINRA. Also why do I need to take a test to be able to invest? I understand the risks and have done my due diligence. Leverage and inverse funds should be treated like any other asset or fund. These potential restrictions are not logical.
