As GOD as my witness, I have the right to invest in any legal entity as I see fit and you should have no opinion or restrict my process in any way whatsoever to do so unless it is in defense of our Constitution.
To those of you who believe otherwise, you have no right under the constitutional laws of OUR GREAT COUNTRY to oppress us "WE THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA"
IT APPEARS AGAIN OUR ELECTED GOVERNMENT ARE TRYING TO STOP WE THE AMERICAN CITIZEN'S FROM HAVING OUR LEGAL RIGHT TO INVEST INTO SOMETHING THAT WE CAN EARN FROM THAT WILL ENHANCE OUR LEGAL RIGHTS GIVEN TO EACH OF US BY OUR CONSTITUTION OF THESE UNITED STATES OS AMERICA AS THEY ARE SEAKING TO STOP ANY OF US FROM HAVING ANY POWER BROUGHT TO AS BECAUSE OF WEALTH WE JUST MAY EARN FROM INVESTMENTS
My name is Ivan Zubkiv. I'm very dissappointed that the regulators are trying to eliminate my rights to chose hove I should invest and what investment I have to choose. I want to be free and have a rights to chose my self to trade what I want and in what to invest. I want to be treated as the same as every reach person or company, have the same rights and be able avoid annessesary measures
Dear FINRA,
I have recently been made aware of the FINRA proposed rule #22-08, and it has me concerned for investors for the following reasons listed below. In summary, I believe if this rule is codified it will hurt investors more than help investors, will hurt the economy around investing in America, and is simply against the freedoms granted to us as being an American citizen.
1) The spirit of
SUGGESTED ROUTING:*
Senior ManagementCorporate FinanceOperationsSyndicate*These are suggested departments only. Others may be appropriate for your firm.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Securities and Exchange Commission has approved amendments to Part i of Schedule D to the NASD By-Laws that provide new and separate fee structures for Nasdaq issuers. The new fees went into effect January 2, 1991.
Naked Shorting and Dark Pool access across the market have gutted the “fair trading market”. Judicial Action and Margin Calls are requested to commence immediately to concurrently and preemptively filter the malicious acts of hedge funds in the United States and it’s chains/conglomerates internationally. Establishing recently passed DTCC and SEC rules must be applied to all active applications
I use inverse leveraged funds as a hedging tool, as a type of insurance if my long investments suffer a large loss. These leveraged funds would then partially offset my loss in my main investments.
I don't think I agree that there should be restrictions on these or other investments as I think this would be a restriction on the freedom which most Americans cherish. I'm not at
Please do not limit my ability to choose leveraged and inverse funds. Without Wall St. experience or a high net worth, I feel confident I can employ these investment vehicles to meet my investment strategies. In today's world, there is a ton of information at our fingertips. These types of investments are useful as a hedge and also can help boost returns without having to buy an
The United States if a free country. All regulatory agencies have a responsibility to protect our freedoms, not restrict them. All financial regulators have a responsibility to ensure investors are adequately informed, but they have no right to restrict our freedom to invest freely as we choose. By limiting access to investments, you limit innovation and also subject retail investors to the
It's my money and I should be able to invest it how I desire! All investments are at risk! Other instruments do not require such ridiculous proposed mandates which limits a U.S. citizen's ability to invest. This is a travesty to have government dictate who can invest in which instruments based on knowledge, wealth, and permission from his/her financial advisor. Please vote against this
