Leveraged and inversed funds are a tremendously helpful tool for building wealth in different market conditions. I strongly oppose efforts to limit the availability of these asset types in my investment accounts.
I don't think government has any place in our investments or how we spend our money.
I find the government spends our money in the most WASTEFUL WAYS.
THE WASTE MONEY AS IF IT GROWS ON TREES.
I think we should have some say in how they spend our money because it's obvious the don't know how to handle money.
Rather than imposing arbitrary restrictions or adding more silly click-thrus, how about a focus on making education and training available, giving retail investors and traders the SAME information that institutional investors see. Perhaps the reason retail traders lost money on some of these things is because institutional investors have an artificial advantage created by current rules, and not
This is the height of arrogance & hypocrisy & is meant to keep small investors impoverished.
Can the people have anything without your hands being in the pot????
There's no sound reason to disallow investors from putting their money towards crypto and futures. Treat it the way every other asset us treated and let the free market decide.
Investors should invest in what they want to invest in. They know the risks. It's simple. Especially in index ETF's
I oppose limitations on my ability to buy the Funds of my choosing
I already despise the Jobs Act for limiting investing, and I am concerned with the further use of limiting who can invest based on net worth (or income).
Investing is a risk, of various levels, but it should not be relegated to only the wealthy, or middle class. Else, it is easier to be stuck at low income when a savings account does not even keep up with inflation. The concept of nanny-state
I adamantly oppose elimination of leveraged and inverse funds
