I not regulators ,should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities. I am capable of understanding my investments and their risks. I do not need these measures
I feel that I have the right as a human being to invest anyway I like and in my family's best interest without the consent of a regulator I also feel that I have the right not to go to the school to take tests or any of that other nonsense I can understand the information just fine the way it's written now to be able to handle myself in any investment situation thank you very much
I understand the risks of investing in leveraged and inverse funds so I only invest a limited part of my overall portfolio in those funds. I do not like to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I do not like any restrictions on my right to invest in those funds.
Each investor should be able to choose the public investments that are right for them. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged ones. No one needs to pass the tests or demonstrate special knowledge to buy/sell these leveraged securities. these are useful tools in protecting the portfolio from market volatility and we should be free to use them however
The federal government has a fiduciary responsibility to its citizens. If requiring me to pass a test or sign a waiver to helps protect uneducated investors, I support FINRAs attempts to better regulate the market. ProShares sent me a share holder notice claiming that FINRA was going to take away the rights of investors, when in fact FINRA is doing their duty to protect U.S. citizens.
Request more transparency. Retail investors should have visibility on all exchanges and they should be immediate. Current technology makes this possible. T+2 system is a relic of an antiquated system. The current system architecture puts all the advantage to large firms that have access to information that is either restricted or delayed to the retail investor. This obviously creates an un-level
SUGGESTED ROUTING
Senior Management
Institutional
Legal & Compliance
Systems
Trading
Executive Summary
On May 19, 1995, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) approved an expansion of the Interpretation to Article III, Section 1 of the NASD Rules of Fair Practice that prohibits a member firm from trading ahead of customers' limit orders in a firm's
Dear Regulators,
I should be able to make my own investment decisions in publicly traded assets based on my understanding of the risks involved in leveraged, Covered Call, inverse, and non K1 commodity funds without the burden of passing additional tests and the elitist nonsense of minimum asset amounts. My traditional "conservative" stock/bond mix portfolios have all dropped
I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before you can invest in public securities like leveraged and inverse funds. Explain that you are capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their
I oppose restrictions to my right to invest on those Leveraged and inverse ProShare ETFs that are currently offered to public. I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before you can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. As long as the description of those funds are available for me to view and understand the risk no additional measures
