As an individual investor, I should be able to choose public investments that are right for me. I shouldn't need to seek regulator's permission for investment choices that are only for the privileged. I shouldn't have to go through any special process (cooling off periods, passing a test, etc) to be able to invest in public investments. Leveraged and inverse funds a among many
I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in any public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I am quite capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks and am actually insulted that you think you know what is right for me. I do not need these measures imposed on me or any other investor.
This is the most rediculous proposal I've heard in a long time. Inverse funds allows investors to stay in turbulent markets. Does FINRA believe passing a test makes you a better investor? Answer: NO. Without these products, individual investor choices become; exit the market, short stocks/ETFs, or options. If FINRA takes the proposed action, they will make lemmings out of the average
To whom it may concern: It should be my choice as to where I invest my hard earned money. I should not have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, or leveraged and inverse funds. I am perfectly capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks. I do not want nor need these measures imposed on me. Thank you.
I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and myfamily. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. I should not have to go through any special process like passing a test before you can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I have been investing in leveraged and inverse funds for years abd unterstand
Me - not regulators should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before you can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. Explain that I am capable of understanding leveraged
Please protect my interest in leveraged and inverse funds. Inverse funds do a great deal of good in balancing a portfolio. I hope that future regulation widens access to securities, and does not prohibit access based on income, or net worth. I also hope that public access to investment products continues without the need for special testing or license to buy and sell stock and that public
Only I not regulators should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. The more government helps me, the more damage they do
I oppose this legislation. Individual investors should be able to choose the publi investments that are right for my family. We should not have to be subject to any special process like passing a test before you can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. Leveraged and inverse funds are important to my investment strategies and work very well to hedge my other investments.
I have been trading leveraged and inverse products almost since their inception. I understand these products and have used them for close to 20 years and have never had a problem. They are the majority of my trading/investing strategy. I cannot understand how taking a test is going to be a better metric for understanding these products than 20 years of "skin in the game". Also I believe
