I oppose the restrictions on being able to buy public investments. I dont think I should have to take any type of test to see if I qualify to purchase any type of investment. I buy different types of investments including cryptos to diversify my investments. I have done quite well in the past with the stock market and plan on living off the investment returns through out my(our) retirement years
I strongly oppose the regulation of types of investments I am able to make for myself and my family. This is the United States of America - we have the freedom to invest in the properties that we choose without special restrictions and without passing a test or having a minimum level of net worth and that should not change. I study long and hard before making an investment decision and do not
TO: All NASD Members and Level 2 and Level 3 Subscribers
On Tuesday, October 15, 1985, 14 issues are scheduled to join the NASDAQ National Market System, bringing the total number of issues in NASDAQ/ NMS to 2,149. These 14 issues, which will begin trading under real-time trade reporting, are entering the NASDAQ/NMS pursuant to the Securities and Exchange Commission's criteria for voluntary
I should be able to choose any investments that I feel are good for me and my familys financial future without having to go through any special processes, testing and/or approvals from others. I have being using leverage and inverse funds to my advantage especially during very volatile markets. I have been using them to my benefit now since 2018. I presently use these funds and this is an
As an experienced investor and trader I strongly oppose any regulations restricting my ability to freely choose my investing / trading instruments, which include leveraged and inverse funds and etfs, which I use frequently as in important component of my overall investing strategy. I should not have to go through some special process like passing a test before I'm given "permission
This is government Over-Reach Constitutionally guaranteed freedoms require: I must be able to choose the legal public investments for myself and your family. These public investments must be available to all of the public, not only the privileged. Any special process or test required before investing in public securities violates guaranteed freedoms of speech and association and is only intended
This rule is so un-necessary. Leveraged and inverse funds are extremely important to my families investment strategy. I use hedges and stop losses and paid advice from investors with over 30 yrs experience to carefully manage these funds. These are a small but very important part of my portfolio and it makes no sense to have to pass a test to make these well thought out and previously successful
We not regulators should be able to choose the public investments that are right for us and our family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. We shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before we can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. Everybody is capable of understanding leveraged and
I do not support SEC Proposed Rule S7-24-15. I should have the right to determine what public investments are right for me without going thru a special process like passing a test. I am capable understanding the risks involved with these securities. Leverage and inverse funds are an important to my investment strategies. I use them to hedge and seek higher returns as a limited portion of my
I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before you can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I am fully capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks. I would like to tell regulators that I do not need these measures imposed on you. My leveraged and inverse funds are important to my investment strategies and help
