Proposed Rule Change to Delay the Implementation Date of the Trade Reporting Amendments Approved Pursuant to SR-FINRA-2013-050
I am strongly against your SEC proposed rule #S7-24-15. We want less regulations from you not more.
This rule is an affront to investors everywhere. To think we are not competent enough to make our own decisions is insulting. Please reject this proposal.
I oppose the rules being considered. Individuals have the right to invest according to their own wishes. Is America a free country or is it a fascist dictatorship?
It would be a shame for these investment vehicles to be ruled unlawful. It is my freedom and right as an investor to use these vehicles to achieve my financial goals
I am against this rule, appears to be a way to exclude the little guy investor from making conservative gains during a down economy.
As a relatively sophisticated inventor, well versed on the risks of investments, I see this rule does not benefit me - but restricts the way I can invest
NASD is filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC” or “Commission”) a proposed rule change to amend NASD Rule 7010(k) to terminate the Bond Trade Dissemination Service (“BTDS”) Professional Delayed-Time Data Display Fee pilot program and the BTDS Non-Professional Real-Time Data Display fee, relating to Trade Reporting and Compliance Engine (“TRACE”) transaction data fees, and to
(a) Each member shall maintain the following information:(1) for each account: (A) customer's name and residence;(B) whether customer is of legal age;(C) name(s) of the associated person(s), if any, responsible for the account, and if multiple individuals are assigned responsibility for the account, a record indicating the scope of their responsibilities with respect to the account
SEC Approves Amendments to Customer Arbitration Code to Simplify Panel Selection in Cases With Three Arbitrators
