Hello!
My name is Jillian Cardona. I live, work and study in the state if Texas. Im a full time college student and work full time. I dont think I should have to pass a special test just to invest. By restricting the peoples right to invest, it will only cause more upset in the American People. There are many good things about living in the United States, like having the freedom of investing.
I believe that I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just privileged individuals and families.
I understand leveraged funds and the risks. I see no need for tests before being able to invest in these funds, nor more measures to impede my options to invest.
I use these types of funds
I should be able to choose the investments that are right for me. I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks. Leveraged and inverse funds are important to my investment strategies and are a limited part of my
TO: All NASD Members and Level 2 and Level 3 Subscribers
On Tuesday, December 2, 1986, 30 issues are scheduled to join the NASDAQ National Market System, bringing the total number of issues in NASDAQ/NMS to 2,687. These 30 issues, which will begin trading under real-time trade reporting, are entering NASDAQ/NMS pursuant to the Securities and Exchange Commission's criteria for
Retail investor like me should have the equal right to choose in public investment like leveraged/inverse ETF as it is very important investment strategy for me. I should not have to go through the special process like passing test. As long as I understand the risk and agree to willing to take risk, I should be able to do it. If this right of mine is going to taken away due to high risk of
To Whom May be Concerned, I am an educated investor and should not have to go through any special process like passing a test before you can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse ETFs. Not only I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks, I truly believe it's my choice and rights to invest on stocks or funds the way I want. That said, the
I am strongly opposed to the proposed regulations on leveraged and inverse funds. Limiting investments like this based on net worth is discriminatory (probably racially discriminatory, whether that is intended or not) and will only further stratify wealth in America at a time when this is already a significant problem. Leveraged and inverse funds are an important part of my investment strategy.
I want to choose my investments and NOT have regulators restrict me. I do not want them "protecting" me. Let me take my own risks. I am a financial professional and don't want to take any test to "qualify me". If I lose my investment, I will not be looking for a bail out. It is my responsibility to assess my own risks. The only exception is if
I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for you and your family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities,
like leveraged and inverse funds. I am capable and am sure many others are as well, of understanding
I am a private investor, I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I have taken several investment courses; I am
