Regulators,
I oppose restrictions to my right to invest in leveraged or inverse funds. These funds are important to my investment strategies and represent a very limited part of my overall financial portfolio. These funds help me hedge my investments.
Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just a select few. I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds
I am not only highly interested in buying any crypto currency in existence, but already involved in crypto as an investment. There should be no special process like passing a test, to invest in public securities, including cryptocurrency funds such as BITO. I am fully capable of understanding cryptocurrency funds such as BITO and their risks.There should be no measures imposed on me, and anyone
I should be able to choose the investments that are right for me. I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks. Leveraged and inverse funds are important to my investment strategies and are a limited part of my
Retail investor like me should have the equal right to choose in public investment like leveraged/inverse ETF as it is very important investment strategy for me. I should not have to go through the special process like passing test. As long as I understand the risk and agree to willing to take risk, I should be able to do it. If this right of mine is going to taken away due to high risk of
It is not the job of FINRA to determine what investments are "proper and allowable" for individuals - that is OUR choice! I use inverse funds to mitigate potential losses from our equity investments - so we can build an equity portfolio but limit potential losses during market swoons by balancing some of the equity positions with inverse funds without having to adjust our equity
I want to choose my investments and NOT have regulators restrict me. I do not want them "protecting" me. Let me take my own risks. I am a financial professional and don't want to take any test to "qualify me". If I lose my investment, I will not be looking for a bail out. It is my responsibility to assess my own risks. The only exception is if
I am strongly opposed to the proposed regulations on leveraged and inverse funds. Limiting investments like this based on net worth is discriminatory (probably racially discriminatory, whether that is intended or not) and will only further stratify wealth in America at a time when this is already a significant problem. Leveraged and inverse funds are an important part of my investment strategy.
To Whom May be Concerned, I am an educated investor and should not have to go through any special process like passing a test before you can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse ETFs. Not only I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks, I truly believe it's my choice and rights to invest on stocks or funds the way I want. That said, the
I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for you and your family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities,
like leveraged and inverse funds. I am capable and am sure many others are as well, of understanding
As an individual investor, I take full responsibility for my investment choices. Public investment tools should be available to all, not just the privileged. Leveraged and inverse funds, options, etc. are important financial tools in the portfolio. I sometimes use them for risk management. I am strongly against the proposal to limit the trading of such financial tools. I do not want to have to go
