I feel that your proposed regulations are insultingly presumptuous. I alone will prosper or suffer from my investments. I dont need interference in my choices. I have been handling investments for many years and have done quite well. I can handle complex instruments, and more importantly I know my limits. I include leveraged or inverse funds when and only when I am comfortable that they are
This reference guide covers a range of private placement topics, from the basic question of "What is a private offering?" to more technical discussions on broker-dealer compliance with FINRA's private placement rules.
I oppose restrictions on my right to invest in public investments. I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before to invest in public securities, like leveraged funds. I am capable of
I oppose restrictions on my investment opportunities. I am a normal "retail" investor and not affiliated with any finanical institution. I have been able to educate myself and understand the risks of "complex" products such as those being considered for these regulations. I should not have to pass any "test", at most only sign/check an
Absolutely absurd and that its being proposed that regular people should have to go through any special process
like passing a test before you can invest in public securities,
People are perfectly capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks. The last thing we need is more government interference. If anything we should be eliminating the option for anyone in government
I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before investing in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks.
Leveraged
Leveraged and Inverse funds should not be restricted, these proposals will unfairly harm the poor by further disadvantaging them from gaining wealth.
I use leveraged funds as just a small portion of my portfolio and I shouldnt be subjected to passing a test or proving my worth in order to use these funds, I can understand risks and manage my own portfolio without anyone else deciding how I should
The restrictions on buying leverage ETFs shouldn't be any more stringent than what it takes to purchase a gun in this country. You can't lose any more money in these types of investments than you can with a risky individual stock. And with leveraged ETFs, they at least offer a level of diversification depending on which one you are investing. Leveraged and inverse funds are important to
I, not regulators should be able to choose the public
investments that are right for me and my family.
Public investments should be available to all of the public,
not just the privileged
I, shouldn't have to go through any special process
like passing a test before you can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I am
capable of understanding
I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process
like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I am
capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks.
Leveraged and inverse funds are important to my investment strategies. I you use leverage and
