An investment adviser is an individual or company who is paid for providing advice about securities to their clients. The term investment adviser refers to an individual or company that is registered as such with either the Securities and Exchange Commission or a state securities regulator.
As Senior Vice President, Corporate Communications, Dana Grosser oversees all of FINRA’s internal and external communications functions, including media relations, digital and multimedia communications, and creative services.
Before joining FINRA in June 2021, Ms. Grosser served as Head of Corporate Public Relations and U.S. Crisis Communications Strategy at Vanguard.
Prior to joining Vanguard
FINRA Amends Section 13 of Schedule A to the FINRA By-Laws to Establish Charges for New Option to File Websites and Web Pages in Native Format
The proposed rule that would restrict MY investments choices is incompatible with a free society. I am an adult and make my own decisions in regards to all aspects of my life, including my investments. FINRA has no role in restricting those decisions. I fully understand what a leveraged fund is, and what an inverse fund is, but that is not the main point. The main point is I should not, after 20
You are not regulators. I should be able to chose my own style of investment. It should be available to all of the public. I should not have to go through any examination or testing before I can invest into public securities. I understand leverage and invest funds and their risks. Leveraged and inverse funds are extremely important for my investment strategy. These securities help me to protect
I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me. Public investments should be available to everyone, not just the privileged. I understand how these products work and do not need oversight from anyone or having to pass a test to invest. Leveraged and inverse funds are important to my overall strategy so I have downside protection if the market tanks. Spend your time
I believe that I - and not regulators with potential agendas should have the right to choose the public investments right for me -- and these shouldn't be restricted to just the privileged. I shouldn't need to go through any special process or testing before I can invest in public securities (such as leveraged and inverse funds) since I'm quite capable of understanding the risks
Regulators should not prohibit access to valuable investment tools that are designed to serve investors in achieving their goals, including retirement. Investors are responsible for choosing the proper investments for themselves and that SHOULD NOT require any measures imposed on investors that would require testing or minimum net worth requirements. Inverse and Leveraged ETF's are valuable
I oppose restrictions on my rights to invest as I wish in public investments in regulated markets. I should be able to choose (without restriction) which investments are right for me, not just the privileged financial class. I shouldn't have to go through some special process or pass a test before having access to any public securities including, but not limited to: inverse funds, leveraged
I am against regulators limiting investors from trading leveraged and inverse funds. They provide me a useful way of hedging so I don't have to sell portions of my portfolio that have tax consequences. These funds also provide additional liquidity to markets allowing them to function. These types of funds are easy to understand so the public should not have to be accredited or pass any test
