Ive worked in an administrative position for many years and am well versed in the market. I currently invest in some leveraged etf funds. Like all stocks and bonds, there is always a risk. It is up to the individual to do their homework. It would be highly unfair to subject regular investors to having to take a test or to jump through hoops to buy some of these products. Obviously global
This screams corruption.
You shouldn't have to go through any special process
like passing a test before you can invest in public securities,like leveraged and inverse funds. I am
capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds
and their risks. I do not
need these measures imposed on me.Leveraged and inverse funds are important to your
investment strategies. Me
I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just privileged.
I should not have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks.
Thanks for taking the time to read this. I am against further restrictions against smaller investors. I should not have to take any additional classes or have any special authorization to invest in leveraged or inverse funds. I understand that these are higher risk investments and I believe that I have the same right to trade them as any large corporate investor. I shouldn't have to
Regulators,
Regarding FINRA Proposed Rule #22-08, I - not regulators should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family.
Public investments should be available to ALL of the public, not just the privileged or those you deem qualified. Less regulation, happier investors.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I
If the market is in fact a free market then this rule proposal would never have been proposed. A free market isn't just for the rich who can afford it. The choice to participate in the market is an individual choice that each person must make for themselves, that should not include taking a test before investing in public securities. Furthermore this will create further speculation that
FINRA should not restrict my ability to utilize leveraged and inverse funds as a means to grow wealth for my family and our future. I don't need you to further encroach on what has been a successful approach to wealth creation by adding extra and over-reaching restrictions and requirements like tests, net worth measures, cooling off periods and broker approvals. You are over-reaching
I not regulators should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. Leveraged and inverse funds are important to my investment strategies to cope up with market direction and events with measured risk that i take and control and not left to luck or hope in investing. I shouldn
I don't think it's right to limit access to leveraged products. The people should have the ability to make their own decisions with their own money. Creating barriers to entry based off tests or net worth is why there is huge wealth inequality. In the past only the privileged had access to investing in general and now that we've made so much progress in allowing regular
The adoption of limiting my ability to trade leveraged ETF's such as provided by Proshares will drive me to find a brokerage that does not belong to FIRNA. Alternatively it will result in my removal of all funds from FIRNA regulated brokerages. I can't say with enough weight this effort to limit my investing options to increase the brokerage profit has severely degraded my
