I don't understand the rationale behind limiting what private party investors can invest in. if its my money and i signed that i read and understand the risks, why are you or anyone going to tell me i cant? this mentality flies in harmony with the idiotic thinking that congress votes Obama care for EVERYONE except themselves... or the vaccine is a mandate for everyone except them. we are way
I, not regulators, should be able independently to choose public investments which are best for me and my family. I should not be required to go through a special process such as passing a test to invest in securities such as leveraged and inverse funds. I as a private investor have sufficient understanding of the workings risks of such funds, and have enjoyed over 20 years of investing in such
I believe that I should have the right to choose how & where I invest, not some regulator who restricts my investment choices, and I shouldn't have to go through any special process before I can invest in public securities, such as inverse funds. I am fully capable of understanding inverse funds and I don't want or need to have these draconian measures imposed on me. Inverse
Please do not further restrict our access to the investment strategies previously only available to insiders/ISDA holders. Vanilla 60/40 allocations are getting killed, and there is essentially no place to hide from crushing inflation, outside of alternative strategies (e.g. managed futures/systematic trend following, inverse/leveraged ETFs, etc.), which are thankfully reasonably accessible and
SUGGESTED ROUTING*
Senior Management
Corporate Finance
Institutional
Legal & Compliance
Municipal
Mutual Fund
Research
Syndicate
Systems
Trading
Training
*These are suggested departments only. Others may be appropriate for your
May 2010 Supplement to the Options Disclosure Document
I as a tax paying citizen not regulators should be able to choose the public investments that are right for myself and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. The people shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before they can invest in public securities, including cryptocurrency funds such as BITO.I have an
I OPPOSE RESTRICTIONS TO MY RIGHT TO INVEST!
I not regulators should be able to choose
the public investments that are right for me and my family.
Public investments should be available to all of the public,
not just the privileged.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities. I am capable of
I oppose new rule making that would make leveraged and inverse ETFs difficult or impossible for normal investors to buy. I have used these sorts of ETFs in the past profitably for both hedging risks and investment purposes. I believe these products are both understandable and useful to the average investor.
Given the recent blow-up of so-called qualified investors and family offices like Bill
Each year, FINRA publishes its Annual Regulatory and Examination Priorities Letter to highlight issues of importance to FINRA's regulatory programs.
