The Trusted Contact Persons topic of the 2024 FINRA Annual Regulatory Oversight Report (the Report) informs member firms’ compliance programs by providing annual insights from FINRA’s ongoing regulatory operations, including (1) regulatory obligations and related considerations, (2) findings and effective practices, and (3) additional resources.
As Senior Vice President, Corporate Communications, Dana Grosser oversees all of FINRA’s internal and external communications functions, including media relations, digital and multimedia communications, and creative services.
Before joining FINRA in June 2021, Ms. Grosser served as Head of Corporate Public Relations and U.S. Crisis Communications Strategy at Vanguard.
Prior to joining Vanguard
I feel that I, not regulators, should have the right to choose the public investments that's best for my family. Publix investment s should be available to all the public, not just the privileged.
I should not have to pass a test in order to invest in public securities, including cryptoocurrency. I am capable of understanding the risk in these types of investments. And I can also
I oppose any action that limits the right of any America citizen to invest in Public investments. I am fully capable of making my investment decisions on my own and am fully capable of understanding the risks should I choose to make them. I do not need to pass a test to demonstrate my investment acumen. The results of my investments will be the testament of my knowledge. This is beyond the role
I have been investing a long time and have bought individual stocks, bonds, ETFs. I have shorted the Market through ETFs. I realize the risks involved. Currently we are in a period where the major market indices are falling. Now is the perfect time to protect part of your portfolio with an ETF that shorts the market. It is like insurance on your home. The goal is to protect your investment. I
More regulations are NOT necessary. Retail investors should be able to freely choose what to invest in. Demanding us to pass tests or going through other special processes is annoying. Restrictions on retail customer access to complex products are even worse - they are unreasonable and unfair. As a leveraged fund investor, I always read through the information and assess risks before making an
Dear Sirs:
I do not think adding additional requirements to the use of leveraged/inverse investments should be used. We have enough regulations now. If an individual wants to use these they already have to agree to various forms required by the brokerage they use.
I don't need to go through any more tests, classes or regulation in my investment decisions.
Let me decide on what I want
The Trusted Contact Persons section of the 2022 Report on FINRA’s Risk Monitoring and Examination Activities (the Report) informs member firms’ compliance programs by providing annual insights from FINRA’s ongoing regulatory operations, including (1) relevant regulatory obligations and related considerations, (2) exam findings and effective practices, and (3) additional resources.
Leveraged Funds are a very important part of my investment which has enabled me to achieve my investment goals that would've been otherwise not possible to achieve. I strongly oppose the proposal by FINRA to restrict the use of Leveraged funds by common investors.
I really don't think the small investors have to go through any special process like passing a test before investing
I am a long term investor. Leveraged and inverse funds are important to my investment strategy. They are a small, but important vehicle for hedging against dramatic swings in the market and are crucial to balancing my portfolio. I understand and accept the risks inherent to the use of inverse funds and do not need special tests in order to invest in them. I believe the proposed restrictions
