This feels a lot like A: nanny states attempting to protect us from ourselves in ways said nanny states don't succeed in protecting *themselves* - I think a government with as much debt as the US govt has has no business telling anyone how to run their money B: a set of rules which advantage the rich while screwing over the rest of us - as per usual, rules for thee, not for me, since I bet
NASD has filed with the SEC portions of a Notice to Members discussing the application of NASD Rule 2790. NASD is not proposing any textual changes to the Rules of NASD.
NASD has filed with the SEC a proposed rule change to amend Schedule B to the NASD By-Laws to correct the inaccurate descriptions of the territorial boundaries of two NASD District Offices.
Optional One-Day Extension for Customer and PAB Reserve Formula Computations and Required Deposits Around the December 2018 Month-End Holidays
INFORMATIONAL
Arbitrator Classification
Effective Date: July 19, 2004
SUGGESTED ROUTING
KEY TOPICS
Legal & Compliance
Arbitration
Arbitrators
Dispute Resolution
Executive Summary
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC or Commission) has approved amendments to Rules 10308 and 10312 of the NASD Code of Arbitration
As an individual investor who has invested in complex instruments for years, I am opposed to these regulatory controls. They are over-reach by the government on the assumption that people are stupid and should be ruled rather than have the freedoms. The barrier to these instruments will not only create obstacle for investment, it will dramatically increase the cost to access these instruments as
Comments: I am a small, (60K portfolio) non-commercial investor, approaching retirement, and I believe FINRA's attempts to require enhancements to current rules on Leveraged and Inverse ETFs (L&I Funds) unnecessarily limits investor choice. Such ETFs are an essential part of my portfolio. FINRA adoption of a more restrictive stance on non-commercial investors ability to buy
NASD has filed with the SEC a proposed rule change to amend NASD Rules 2211 and 3110(g) to require that members participate in the Federal Trade Commission’s ("FTC's") national do-not-call registry.
I strongly oppose any limitations that may be placed on investors who want to participate in short funds or leveraged funds. I have been investing in the stock market since 1993 and fully understand the risks inherent in these types of funds. When used properly to hedge a portfolio they can be very important. I strongly suspect that rules like this one being proposed will end up hurting the
Please understand the consequences of the proposed rule, I need flexibility on investment opportunities and this rule could stop my ability to determine my own investing strategy. I don't need a certification to make the right decision on how I should invest my own money. My money, my risk, no need for anyone else to be involved. Please do not overact because some people play the market and
