As a long-term holder of leveraged and inverse investment positions, I would vehemently oppose the removal of these investment vehicles.
These investments broaden my set of choices and exposure without requiring as much capital or the need for options trading.
The removal of options from a publicly traded market place deprives it of diversity. Diversity allows investors to better invest their
Do not limit investors ability to invest in leveraged and inverse funds. These are a tool just like any other tool. Investors know their risk and reward and chose to buy or not. If you know what is best for investors than you should quit your job and trade for your living since you know better than everyone else.
Individual investors NEED access to ETFs, and taking access away is against American principles of a free market. ANY investment carries a risk, and by eliminating access to ETFs you are not eliminating risk, you're simply transfering risk to another asset group or to another institution/agent which, by all accounts, is NOT a better solution for the average investor.
Thank you.
I use inverse etfs to hedge my portfolio. Similar to long only etfs, it allows short position across a broader spectrum than a single stock short position. In my circumstance, understanding and managing the risks of utilizing an inverse etf are a much better way to manage downside risk than the complexity of shorting individual stocks.
Good evening, I write to explain my frustration with the current market, some market makers as well as bad players. The United States stock market is currently very manipulated and it is becoming so obvious that I feel it is endangering the US stock market. Short selling has become a big problem for a few players out there. I believe they have made a lot of money and when caught the fines have
It's especially important regulators hear from you in your own words. Please use the body of this email to customize your response.
As a citizen of the United States of America, this ruling seems to take away a freedom and would suppress our ability to better our financial success. We should able to "gamble" if we so see fit.
Truly, the less legislators try to micromanage my private investments and trades the better. Really it is a bit galling and insulting to constitutes that you assume we don't have the knowledge to write covered calls, or puts if needed to protect our investments. Please stop trying to help where it is not needed. Go work on cutting corporate welfare it needs reform.
Hello! I appreciate the ability to be able to personally invest directly in Leveraged ETFs and other Leveraged Products. I feel like there are sufficient resources available for me to make educated decisions. I would not be able to qualify as being an accredited investors yet (but will in the next few years). I think fewer restrictions on these investment products would be better for many
You can't regulate stupid. Don't fix what isn't broke. Newbies or inexperienced investors will find no better way to learn then to have skin in the game. These funds are complex enough, over-regulation just handicaps the majority in an effort to protect the few too lazy to do their due diligent-es, then cry wolf because they didn't understand. Such people will learn quick or
I am responsible for my own investments, and for the risks I am willing to accept. Do not play big government that thinks it knows better than I do about the risks I am willing to accept. I am college educated and have been invested for decades. Please leave my investment decisions up to me and do not interfere with my right to invest as I please.
