I understand the risks and rewards of leveraged funds, and have used them to my advantage. However, I understand they can be dangerous in the hands of the uneducated. I believe some type of mild screening process would be useful, i.e., specialized reading materials and a test targeted at leveraged funds only, without other more heavy handed restrictions. The individual, once educated, has a right
I strongly disagree with restrictions being placed on leveraged, public investments. Leveraged ETFs are an important part of my equity portfolio. I have also used inverse leveraged funds in the past. I should not be restricted from using these funds and I should not have to take a test to prove to anyone that I understand the risks of investing in leveraged funds. I already get a "pop up
I have recently established a brokerage account which was made available by my company. I have applied a portion of my 401k income towards leveraged funds. I am well aware of the risks and consider myself to be an informed investor. I do not believe I should have requirements imposed such as tests. Nor do I believe I require a cooling off period as I have already invested effort and expense into
I not regulators should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I do not need these measures imposed on me. Leveraged and
I OPPOSE TE RESTRICTIONS FOR MY RIGHT TO INVEST
I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and myfamily.
Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before investing in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds.
I am capable
I don't believe that it should be necessary to have any sort of 'test' or other requirements to invest in leveraged funds. While there are risks, potentially substantial, the bulk of brokers require today that you sign a statement understanding the risks of leveraged investing.
Perhaps the compromise should NOT be to move leveraged investing to non-public forms, but to
I oppose regulations that limit my right to invest in public securities and public investments, including inverse funds and leveraged products. People should not have to pass regulator-imposed tests or have high net worth in order to be allowed to make investments and balance their portfolios with the products that best represent their investment goals and risk appetite.
If there are investment
I and others should have the right to buy and sell any investments that we feel are right for those and their families when and if we so choose. Public investments should be available to all of the public not just those that are privileged. I also shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities like leveraged and inverse funds
I oppose restrictions on my rights to invest in public investments.
I believe I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged and
It seems that every day there is a new government restriction on the citizens of this country. Wear a mask, get a jab, do this, don't do that, over and over and over. This is just one more power grab by the ruling class, one more attempt to exclude citizens from what they have, to restrict our freedom to live as WE see fit, not subject to a "test" or a qualification
