Dear Madam, Sir,
I strongly believe passing this law would hurt investors like me who are getting to the capital market with small investments and using inverse funds as a hedge strategy to beat the market volatility, even though it is a small portion of my overall portfolio.
I believe public investment should be available to all of the public without any requirement of passing a test. Anyone who
I should not have to go through a list of regulatory imposed steps to conduct investiments of my choice. Inverse funds are essential to my investment choices. I oppose these types of mandates:
-Pass a regulator-imposed test of my specialized investment knowledge
-Demonstrate a high net worth
-Get special approval from my broker
-Attest to reading certain materials
-Go through cooling-off
As an experienced investor who has been making my own financial decisions for 20 years, I find it to be an overreach by FINRA to restrict the ability for me to make my own decisions, thus forcing me to utilize unnecessary investment advisor firms. There are countless resources available to the general public, as well as investment documentation available to investors to understand the risks
Dear Sirs/Madams, It's come to my attention that you are considering regulating so-called complex or leveraged ETFs. As an active small investor, I implore you not to do so. I use these ETFs to hedge risk in the marketplace, and this gives me confidence in my investments, knowing that I can sustain market shocks, as well as to maintain reasonable rates of return. I have been using these for
I not regulators should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds
Hi, I like to have freedom to invest in leveraged and inverse funds without going through tests and additional constraints. I usually do my research on what I'm investing and so knowledgeable enough to make my own independent decisions considering all risks involved. I usually use these funds to hedge my investments or get some higher returns based on their leverage. I want investment
I'm writing because I'm invested in funds such as BITO. It has come to my attention that FINRA wants to regulate these in such a way that investors are required to become accredited, pass tests, get special approval, cooling off periods, etc. I disagree with this and believe anyone should be allowed to invest in public securities with their own money, without government scrutiny. Laws
Hello, I am very concerned about your proposed regulations on investing. As I am an adult and a head of household spending my money, I should have the final say on how I invest it. I fully understand the risks of investing and don't need to be tested on the subject. I do not need a cooling off period, because i research investments, and I certainly don't need someone's permission
This is class warfare, plain and simple. I oppose any restriction to my right to invest. Public investments should be available to all of the public. There should be no special processes, tests, or approval in order to invest in leveraged and inverse funds. Basically, too many average Joes saw this [REDACTED] of a market crash coming and decided to hedge like smart investors, but now that's
First of all, thank you for letting me know about this. I know enough about leveraged and inverse funds and am constantly dealing with their risks. And I am constantly striving to acquire for a lot of knowledge and information. Therefore, I oppose any restrictions or other testing measures on my investment rights. Currently, the leveraged stocks I focus on invest in because they are made up of
