I strongly oppose restrictions on my right to invest in public investments because I believe that I - not regulators - should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. I believe that I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can
Dear FINRA,
Public investments should be available to all of the public NOT just the PRIVILEDGED. I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me.
I am very capable of understanding investments and the risk. I shouldn't have to go through any special process of test taking before investing in leveraged and inverse funds. I have done my own research and are very
SUGGESTED ROUTING
Senior Management
Institutional
Legal & Compliance
Systems
Trading
Executive Summary
On May 19, 1995, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) approved an expansion of the Interpretation to Article III, Section 1 of the NASD Rules of Fair Practice that prohibits a member firm from trading ahead of customers' limit orders in a firm's
Dear FINRA, Thank you in advance for hearing me out. I oppose regulation that would require testing, verification of net worth, broker approvals, paused trading periods, and other burdens that would inhibit my ability to control my investments and financial future. Hedge funds and inverse funds are an important part of my portfolio and allow me to protect my retirement portfolio. Additional
.view-content div div span h2
{
font-weight:500;
margin-top:40px;
}
.view-header h2
{
font-size:3rem;
color:#999999;
font-weight:250;
border-top:2px solid #cccccc;
margin-top:15px;
padding-top:15px;
}
@media print {
footer {page-break-after: always;}
.block-block-content13129ca4-9a12-445a-8240-396c465d4de4{display:none;}
}
Table of Contents
PART I INTERPRETIVE MATERIAL, DEFINITIONS,
I am a very average investor and have been using leveraged and inverse ETFs to enhance returns for over a decade.
I don't want to have to go through training or pass a test in order to trade these funds and find it insulting that FINRA thinks so little of the general public that we're incapable of understanding the benefits and risks of leveraged and inverse ETFs.
Without
Me not regulators should be able to choose the public
investments that are right for me and my family.
Public investments should be available to all of the public,
not just the privileged.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process
like passing a test before you can invest in public securities,
like leveraged and inverse funds. I am capable of understanding
First off, Investing in whatever it is should be understood before hand. I think everyone knows that it is Risky for any type of investment.
I, and not regulators should be able to choose the public
investments that are right for Me and my family.
Public investments should be available to all of the public,
not just the privileged.
I shouldn't have to go through any
I oppose restrictions being placed on my right to choose and invest in stocks/bonds/annuities/funds/ETFs/crypto with my own resources as I see fit.
I have been investing for nearly 30 years, carefully researching the products I trade without relying on any particular broker nor adviser. I have recently added cryptocurrency assets, including BITO Proshares. I view this as an additional branch to
I, not regulators, should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just privileged. I should not have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and
