I should be able to choose the public investments that are right to balance my portfolio. I am capable of understanding the risks of leveraged and inverse funds. I have been self directed trading for over 15 years and do not need restrictions on my right to invest in public investments. I limit my investment in leveraged and inverse funds to funds that I can afford to lose if they do not work
I oppose the restrictions to my right to invest.It poses a severe threat towards market fairness. It's like locking people in home because of Flu. Retail traders or investors should be able to freely choose whatever products that fit their trading strategies. Finance is NOT only for the rich or the privileged. We know what leveraged funds are. Also, the liquidity will be severely
I use inverse funds to keep my savings from reducing because of inflation. In a time when stocks, bonds and cash are all loosing value, inverse funds are the easiest way to protect my savings. Put options are difficult to understand, and my brokerage will not let me short stocks directly.
If you want to discourage gambling tax trades and make casinos illegal.
Please do not regulate levered ETFs more than already existing regulations. These would just cause higher expenses to existing brokers to ensure that the paperwork is accurate. I think the increase of options trading has added to market volatility not the levered ETFs. These provide a great way for active traders to express their investment views day to day. I believe current regulations are
It poses a severe threat towards market fairness. It's like locking people in home because of Flu, but except the rich ones. All retail traders or investors should be able to freely choose whatever products that fit their trading strategies. Finance is NOT only for the rich or the privileged. We know what leveraged or inverse funds are. Also, the liquidity will be severely affected if passed
Leveraged and inverse ETFs are important to help an investor manage smoother results over time, protecting returns from other investments that vary cyclically over time. Such funds have been firmly established for years and are widely known throughout the investment community. For publicly traded funds, the public should not have to go through ad hoc, repeated exams by an agency.
Myself, not regulators should be able to choose the public
investments that are right for me. I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds.
I have been trading leveraged funds for almost a decade, and rely on this actively for income. I use inverse funds to hedge and mitigate risk.
Violates the Existence of a Free Market is a basic principle of trading in the Stock Market. The inverse leveraged Securities have taken a Hugh Beating while the Indexes continued to rise.
Now that the Trends are changing Regulators are wanting to
place restrictions on these leveraged inverse funds.
Short Selling is not regulated and it is normally augured that it is necessary for a Free
I do not support this regulation. I trade stocks for a living and these vehicles are vital to my ability to make a living. Regulations restricting leveraged and inverse funds are onerous and unnecessary. There are more than enough disclosures required by brokers that can inform the retail investor. These actions will only enrich an already highly-profitable financial industry through the forced
This is not freedom. We do not need the FINRA restricting what securities people can buy or sell. We saw issues with Gamestop stock for example. The playing field should be level. It's even possible that people use outside the box trades, such as covered calls on TQQQ due to the high volatility and holding over time, arguably a reasonable approach given enough timeline.
