I have been using leveraged etf's for 10 years...i like them...they allow me to invest a smaller percent of portfolio and still get a return. Trade frequently every week. The risks are well documented. What i dont like are ETNs that close during times of market volatility.
As far as i am concerned... I am an individual investor.....Who are you to tell me how much money i can make
It poses a severe threat towards market fairness. It's like locking people in home because of Flu, but except the rich ones. All retail traders or investors should be able to freely choose whatever products that fit their trading strategies.
Finance is NOT only for the rich or the privileged. Raising the bars limits our capabilities. We know what leveraged or inverse funds are. Also,
I understand that a key investment vehicle that I use in management of my portfolio may be restricted by the proposed rules. I hope that I and other individual investors will not be restricted by these changes. Many of the systems and trading rules advantage big investors while small investors are unable to achieve the scale or resources to obtain these benefits.
Please don't restrict
Freedom and self-determination are essential to a better life for me and my family. I have spent much time and dollars to equip myself for trading options and futures to which I have been able to better my returns and hedge my accounts from future declines. Therefore, I say that I should have the freedom to engage with these instruments without interference to achieve my financial objectives.
This likely wouldn't protect as intended. Those with this risk appetite will simply search out other risky (and riskier) assets. Restricting the free market in this way will just hurt more than it will help. The risks associated with leveraged and inverse products is well documented, and all brokerages that offer them prompt with warnings before allowing trades. Adding extra bars for entry
I haven't read the material yet, but at first blush this is quite an overreach. Not everyone can win - yet those that lose run to elected officials & want a refund for their poor risk management. Day trading "rules" changed nothing but the amount that could be lost to a greater amount. Time would be well spent helping the gamblers buying 0 DTE puts &
I strongly oppose to limit my choice of investment. The restriction poses a severe threat towards market fairness. It's like locking people in home because of Flu, but except rich people. Retail traders or investors should be able to freely choose whatever products that fit their trading strategies. Finance is NOT only for the rich or the privileged. We know what leveraged funds are. Also,
Heavy disclosure on the risks associated with these securities (leveraged funds) already exist. The brokerage community is doing a fine job without any required regulation. Tax payer monies can be better spent. As an example, when I purchase these securities in my account, and I use several brokerage firms, a large warning sign pops up and I can not complete the trade until I have read the note
SUGGESTED ROUTING
Senior Management
Institutional
Legal & Compliance
Mutual Fund
Operations
Systems
Trading
Executive Summary
On March 17, 1995, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) approved the NASD's amendments to Sections 5, 6, 12,46, and 64 of the Uniform Practice Code (the UPC) and Sections 1 and 26 of the Rules of Fair Practice (the RFP) to conform the NASD
SUGGESTED ROUTING
Legal & ComplianceOperationsSystemsTrading
The schedule of trade dates-settlement dates below reflects the observance by the financial community of Veterans' Day, Friday, November 11, 1994, and Thanksgiving Day, Thursday, November 24, 1994. On Friday, November 11, The Nasdaq Stock Market™ and the securities exchanges will be open for trading. However, it
