To whom it may concern,
I oppose restrictions to my right to invest in any public investments of all types.
I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and your family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before you can invest in public
Hello, As a person who has personally traded leveraged funds for years it would be detrimental to both myself and my family to be restricted from doing so. I do not feel that it is appropriate for you to restrict us from trading these funds. Leveraged funds are a key part of our investment strategy and we understand the risks associated with them. We feel that if we choose to invest our money
I should be able to freely choose the public investments that are right for me. Not regulators. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.
I have been managing my own investments for 30 years, and I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities like leveraged and inverse funds. I
I am aware of the restrictions that may be introduced on my leveraged investments and I strongly appose any limitations likely to be considered on these investments! As a private investor I should be allowed to choose where to invest my capital as I take full responsibility for the outcomes of my investment strategy. I understand leveraged and inverse funds and am fully aware of the risks
I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for you and your family.
Public investments should be available to all of the public,not just the privileged.
Restricting this will encourage my to not invest into the market.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process
like passing a test before you can invest in public securities,
like leveraged and inverse funds.
TO: All NASD Members and Level 2 and Level 3 Subscribers
On Tuesday, July 1, 1986, 18 issues are scheduled to join the NASDAQ National Market System, bringing the total number of issues in NASDAQ/NMS to 2,420. These 18 issues, which will begin trading under real-time trade reporting, are entering NASDAQ/NMS pursuant to the Securities and Exchange Commission's criteria for voluntary
Hello, Thank you for the opportunity to voice my opinion regarding this issue. As a small investor, I value a lot the opportunities presented from reversed and leverage assets. Public investments should be available to all the public, not just the privileged ones. I shouldnt have to go through any special process like passing tests before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged and
It is my right and privilege to be able to invest in funds as I see fit to my investment strategy, to include inverse and leveraged funds. I should not be forced to pass any special tests or processes to be able to invest freely. After 13 years of the Fed funding the markets and over $7 trillion dollars on the Fed balance sheet creating an unprecedented rate of inflation, it is not ironic that
I should have the right to be able to choose investments that are right for me and my family - not regulators. Public investments are called PUBLIC for a reason - they should be available to the public not a select privileged group that gets to profit while others miss their chance. I am capable of understanding leveraged funds and their risks and it is my money I am taking the risk with not
Dear FINRA. I am an individual investor writing to ask that you not regulate, restrict, or in any way make more complex the task of investing in leveraged or inverse funds. The markets are a two way street. It is important to be able to manage one's money on both the long and short side. Beware unintended consequences of your decisions. Restricting individual investors from carefully
