I oppose restrictions on my right to invest in any public investments I choose and feel it is very unfair to hold these funds back for just the privileged. I am capable of understanding the risks involved by investing in leveraged and inverse funds and do not need to pass a test before investing. Trading the inverse funds in recent months has enhanced my returns a great deal with so much
Dear sirs
I am testing a strategy using leveraged ETF's. My simulation shows it is feasible and successful. I have the following considerations:
1. ETF's are funds of many stock stocks, especially market ETF such as TQQQ. It has market risk but not the risk of individual companies. Sometimes, individual companies have higher risk than the market itself.
2. My strategy is short
Sirs: As an investment advisor with over 35 years experience, please accept this message as my opposition to regulation changes being considered regarding Inverse and Leveraged ETF's.
It is my belief that the advisor and/or the investing public should have the right to make investment choices for their accounts. Not the regulators.
As an experienced advisor, I believe I am capable of
We - not regulators - should be able to choose the public investments that are right for us and our families. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.
I/We shouldn't have to go through any special process like
passing a test before we can invest in public securities, including cryptocurrency funds such as BITO.
We are capable of understanding
I, not regulators, should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before you can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse
I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process
like passing a test before you can invest in public securities,
like leveraged and inverse funds. I am fully capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds
I oppose any limitations on my investments because it is an investors right to freely access the entirety of the public securities markets without arbitrary restrictions. I want to maintain the freedom to access a broad range of investment products that help me build better portfolios. It is I who have the right to decide which public equities, bonds and funds I want to buy, not the regulators.
I should be able to choose the public
investments that are right for me and my family.
Public investments should be available to all of the public,
not just the privileged.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process
like passing a test before I can invest in public securities,
like leveraged and inverse funds. Explain that I am
capable of understanding
Limiting my ability to invest in leveraged instruments would be yet another exercise of a "Nanny State." It would also be a restriction of my Free Speech - just as much as restricting my ability to donate (or not) to your patron's re-election campaigns. Leveraged instruments are the key to my investment strategies and financial future. I use them to hedge my other investments.
I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.
Besides, leveraged and inverse funds are important to my investment strategies.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process
like passing a test before you can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I
