Comments:
I believe you are wrong in assuming that investors using leveraged products are not totally educated in the product. I am 75 years old and have been trading on my own fo over 40 years. I find using leveraged and inverse funds very useful in balancing my investments. I believe it would be a wrong move and an over reach to close this type of investment. Before I execute the buy or sell of
This is very unfair. I should continue to have the freedom to invest in what and when I want without any third party intervention. I made my investment decisions with full responsibility. There are tools and resources available for investing. Each person has their own responsibility to educate themselves before they make an investment decision. Each platform that I invest through provides
Comments:
As an individual investor who relies on leveraged and inverse ETFs to actively monitor and manage short term trading strategies, these instruments are critical to compliment more conventional products while providing desired exposure to targeted segments of the market. Notably, leveraged and inverse ETFs also provide an effective means to hedge other more conventional positions. The
This puts the consumer at a disadvantage. Inverse and leveraged have their place for definite reasons such as hedging in order to limit or even gain on a potential loss. Or you have want to effectively want to increase ones exposure to a particular short term. IF people can trade options and warrants I don't understand why this area would not be treated differently after all these
Leveraged & Inversed ETF's are important to the way I invest. PLEASE. Don't make any changes to the way these are made available to myself and other investors. I have been trading triple leveraged TQQQ, SQQQ, TECL, TECS, TNA, TZA, UPRO, SPXU and many others since June 2006 and have never had a problem and can't understand why anyone thinks there is a problem
I am writing to voice my opposition to the proposed rules for investing in leveraged and inverse funds. Its a violation of my rights as an investor and imposes unreasonable burden on my ability to trade in a timely manner. I consider myself well informed and do not need additional regulations to guide my investment choices. Leveraged and inverse products are an important part of my investment
TAKING AWAY "OUR" RIGHT TO INVEST WITH WHOM "WE" WANT IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL!!! POLITICIAN'S WERE INVESTING, WHICH IS INSIDER TRADING IS ILLEGAL... DO YOU SEE ANY OF THEM IN PRISON, MARTHA STEWART PAYED HER DUES??? THE DEMONICRATS DO AS THEY PLEASE WITHOUT ANY CONSIQUENCES... WHAT THEY ARE TRYING TO DO IS TURN "OUR" FREE COUNTRY INTO A
This is disgusting!! once again, you limit the options for the average american and give even more advantage to the rich in the stockmarket! Obviously, your motive is to prevent declines in stock prices,90% of which are owned by the top 10% of the population. Leveraged and inverse funds are easier to trade and safer than options and futures. The rich don't need any more advantages than they
This is as misguided on the part of FINRA as it gets. The entire regulatory structure is built to support the "long equities all the time" theme. Decades of essentially free money have made publicly traded equities on US exchanges one of the riskiest assets in the world. When the bond market takes the printing press away from the Federal Reserve (it is not a question of if, but when),
Regulators,
I urge you not to enact any legislation that limits or impedes my ability to choose for myself which investments are appropriate for me and my family.
In particular, I am especially against any proposal that will restrict or complicate my ability to strategically trade leveraged ETF's and similar products. I have effectively used these products to enhance my own personal
