Investors should be able to freely their investments and plan their strategies without burdensome regulations.
Making this change will damage my future retirement plans and set me back indefinetly
We don't need the state meddling in our investments. I suspect this planned regulation is unconstitutional.
The Liquidity section of the 2018 Report on Exam Findings informs member firms’ compliance programs by describing recent findings and observations from FINRA’s examinations, and, in certain cases, also providing a summary of effective practices.
Leveraged ETFs have been helpful in my retirement planning. I am aware of their risks and limitations
as a long term investor in SH, I strongly object to plans to restrict investment leveraged and invest funds.
Do not close inverse and leveraged funds . Its important to the individual to be able to plan his retirement
Dear Sirs:
I invest via a systematic quarterly plan that utilizes leveraged ETFs. I know what I am doing. Correct use of these leveraged products is a key part of my financial plan.
Leveraged funds are important to me. They improve my performance over the long term. I am not engaged in reckless trading, I understand the effect of daily magnification of an indexs price movement, and benefit from
Risk and reward go together in Free Enterprise. The responsibility to understand risk and then willingness to engage are an individual's prerogative. Those of us who are educated, responsible, and recognize the downside should be allowed to invest in leveraged funds. I am somewhat offended that people who don't understand the risk "cry foul" when they don
Hello,
I oppose the restrictions to my right to invest. The proper use of leveraged products is a key part of my financial plan. I run a systematic quarterly rebalancing plan that is powered by leveraged ETFs which I have used successfully for several years. These funds are important to me as they improve my performance over the long term. I am not engaged in reckless trading, and I
