You should do more to educate people on our modern financial system instead of taking away their ability to invest how they see fit. It's not your concern how or why I invest my money. If Nancy Pelosi and other politicians can participate in stock market trades all while making laws that affect company stock price, then I should be able to decide how I want to invest my dollar.
Do you
Comments: I believe that access to leveraged and inverse funds has helped me hedge my portfolio. Without these products my portfolio would slide to zero. Do not make any changes in this volatile environment. There is no need to enhance any rules.
Do not restrict or disqualify my right to trade these products.
The purpose is short term active hedging.
Brokerage firms provide sufficient
Absolutely absurd and that its being proposed that regular people should have to go through any special process
like passing a test before you can invest in public securities,
People are perfectly capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks. The last thing we need is more government interference. If anything we should be eliminating the option for anyone in government
To Whom It May Concern, I am appalled by any restrictions made on publicly traded securities, especially targeting the individual investor, like myself. I am fully capable and understand the risk involved in any investment, and should have the liberty to choose where to invest, without restrictions. In times like these, and market instability, leveraged and inverse funds are critical to my
this poses a severe and serious threat towards maket fairness. it's like locking us in home due to covid, but except the rich people and goverment people like you. retail traders or inverstors should have right to be freely choose whatever products and security that fit our trading strageties. Regulations should not be bias, only be supportative to rich people and people having authroitise.
Dear Sirs;
I strongly object to any rulings curtailing my ability to trade and buy leveraged and inverse funds, and dozens of other popular
investments deemed to be complex by regulators.
I am highly qualified to make my own investment choices and clearly understand the risks involved and I DO so in full knowledge of those complex structures. They ENHANCE AND PROTECT MY OVERALL INVESTMENT
I am an investor who trades with New York Stock Exchange shares. In order for markets to truly be free and fair, there needs to be a level playing field for all entities involved. This is agnostic of the risks involved. Deviating from that impacts trust as it can be interpreted that retail investors have different rules from other investor entities. I do not support this rule as it's
Madam/Sir: I have been investing and trading in securities for decades. The 2 and 3 times leveraged ETFs have been one of the most innovative and practical financial tools for my portfolio management. Leveraged ETFs are my main tool to hedge my portfolio volatility without liquidating my stocks and attempting to rebuy them later. No further regulation is necessary. There are countless ways to
I likely would fit all the criteria (VHNW, etc.) which I sort of sign off on for options trading at Fidelity yet I oppose this action. There are better ways to achieve investor protection without making them jump through hoops which in practice just turn out to be theatre.
I agree with extensive warning and labels to ward off uneducated investors. But regulator imposed tests, etc. are just
I have been informed that the above referenced regulatory notice is being considered.
I strongly object to the intent of this proposed regulation. I do not believe that FINRA should be able to restrict my ability to chose my investments or to make me go thru a bureaucratic process to establish my right to make those investments. I have been trading these investment vehicles for many years and
