this poses a severe and serious threat towards maket fairness. it's like locking us in home due to covid, but except the rich people and goverment people like you. retail traders or inverstors should have right to be freely choose whatever products and security that fit our trading strageties. Regulations should not be bias, only be supportative to rich people and people having authroitise.
Dear Sirs;
I strongly object to any rulings curtailing my ability to trade and buy leveraged and inverse funds, and dozens of other popular
investments deemed to be complex by regulators.
I am highly qualified to make my own investment choices and clearly understand the risks involved and I DO so in full knowledge of those complex structures. They ENHANCE AND PROTECT MY OVERALL INVESTMENT
I have been informed that the above referenced regulatory notice is being considered.
I strongly object to the intent of this proposed regulation. I do not believe that FINRA should be able to restrict my ability to chose my investments or to make me go thru a bureaucratic process to establish my right to make those investments. I have been trading these investment vehicles for many years and
Madam/Sir: I have been investing and trading in securities for decades. The 2 and 3 times leveraged ETFs have been one of the most innovative and practical financial tools for my portfolio management. Leveraged ETFs are my main tool to hedge my portfolio volatility without liquidating my stocks and attempting to rebuy them later. No further regulation is necessary. There are countless ways to
I likely would fit all the criteria (VHNW, etc.) which I sort of sign off on for options trading at Fidelity yet I oppose this action. There are better ways to achieve investor protection without making them jump through hoops which in practice just turn out to be theatre.
I agree with extensive warning and labels to ward off uneducated investors. But regulator imposed tests, etc. are just
I am an investor who trades with New York Stock Exchange shares. In order for markets to truly be free and fair, there needs to be a level playing field for all entities involved. This is agnostic of the risks involved. Deviating from that impacts trust as it can be interpreted that retail investors have different rules from other investor entities. I do not support this rule as it's
FINRA has updated the Alternative Display Facility (ADF) User Guide and ADF FIX Specification for Trade Reporting to now include the Members Exchange (MEMX).
Each document’s Revision History illustrates these changes and impacted fields.
Questions regarding this notice should be sent to FINRA Product Management or call (866) 899-2107.
No one has a problem with investing in Amazon of Nvidia or Facebook at their high points only to watch them lose 25% of their value in a matter of weeks if not days. But yet you want to "protect me" from a leveraged or inverse fund. Best case scenario is you do nothing and let me be responsible for me. At worst is a one time information screen that I agree that I am trading in a
It does not make any sense to try and make it harder for the common man to invest in the very vehicles designed for them in the first place. An ETF was originally made by Morningstar to make it so anyone could invest without having to have extensive knowledge or even actually knowing about investing. And now you want to undermine this? This tactic is nefarious and you all should be ashamed. Maybe
I want to invest in what I want and make my own decision. Leveraged funds, inverse funds, etc. I don't need you to "protect" me be taking my options off the table. I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test or anything else. I use these funds to hedge risks or double down on high-conviction shorter term trades. You will hurt me and
