Proposed Rule Change Relating to the Handling of Stop and Stop Limit Orders
I do not support this regulation. I trade stocks for a living and these vehicles are vital to my ability to make a living. Regulations restricting leveraged and inverse funds are onerous and unnecessary. There are more than enough disclosures required by brokers that can inform the retail investor. These actions will only enrich an already highly-profitable financial industry through the forced
Leveraged security and option instruments are important components of both my short and long term investment plans. Over-regulating these financial instruments could potentially cause great financial harm and substantially reduce future returns. Limiting investments to only individuals of high net worth seems to be against the Equal Protection Clause established by the 14th Amendment to the US
Comments: I am NOT in favor of limiting access to leveraged and inverse ETFS. I feel that they provide a substantial level of reasonably priced financial access to both downside protection and upside appreciation, when used responsibly, that is not available in any other investment product. Options can provide similar financial access to these parameters, but can be much more expensive to employ
1. The most neglected field in investor education is equity market manipulation. New retail investors should be informed about perpetual option fail-to-delivers, married-puts, shorting via exchange-traded-funds, off-exchange trading and selling synthetic shares to manipulate a stock's price. 2. From a retail investor's perspective: An open forum where individual users can share investor
Limiting citizens ability to trade leveraged funds, commodity funds, REITs and various other financial instruments is a direct attack on the citizenry and should be unconditional. This would be a hindrance on financial freedom in what is a world where opportunities and social mobility is increasingly hard to find. As a broker and US citizen, I vehemently oppose such a rule and think those who
img.snapshot{border:1px solid #cccccc;margin-top:10px;}
.blueButton{
background-color: #1063A0;
color: #fff;
border-radius: 10px;
display: inline;
font-size: 14px;
max-width: 200px;
padding: 15px;
text-align: center;
text-transform: uppercase;
transition: all 0.3s ease-out;
width: calc(100% - 30px);
}
.blueButton a{color:#ffffff}
.Report_TOC{
Please let everyone have the opportunity to invest in the future not just wealthy individuals and financial institutions. Guidance is appreciated but control over opportunities to invest in our future and to make life changing gains is not. People learn best when making mistakes, Americans love challenges and we don't need anyone to cut off our financial opportunities allowing only the
I am strongly opposed to any regulation that would exclude anyone with a cash account from investing in complex financial instruments. This could lead to biases based on education level, race, beliefs, net worth, etc.
I believe that margin access could benefit from further scrutiny when used to purchase any financial instrument.
I am supportive of increasing awareness and additional education,
[REDACTED] I earn my money and I don't want to be told how I can invest it. The truth is that no one bothers to understand who you are, how to harm your career and your personal financial situation, etc. That can change. People need to fight back against their loss of financial freedom, freedom of speech, and the other freedoms our ancestors literally died so that we could have.
