WE OPPOSE RESTRICTIONS TO OUR RIGHT TO INVEST. We not regulators should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. We shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. We fully
I am writing in opposition to limiting, and/or curtailing, access to certain complex trades. Limiting access to the general public promotes a preferred class and thus discriminates. Mandating qualifications further promulgates class distinction, in the guise of evaluating financial literacy. It perpetuates an old-boy culture.
Free and open trade should be supported; not denied. Individual
Dear FINRA Members, As well as you may know, in Argentina we have serious limitations or restrictions to manage our own surplus money. And that's the reason why I thought your country was a bit different from ours, because you have the freedom (as in many other things) to invest in whatever you want to. Now, reading about all these "rules" "tests" , etc only brings me bad
The reasons I am opposed at any further regulations that restrict my ability to trade in securities of my choice is that it would limit my ability to offset the volatility of many of the securities I choose to trade. I am able to determine my risk levels and leverage levels when trading and I oppose any special process you may be considering, such as tests. I do not need to be hampered by any
I am writing to protest the proposed regulation.
As investors in equity markets, I and all other participants should be able to choose the investments suitable for ourselves without being subject to dictates from regulators. Regulators cannot understand an investor's specific perspective; only the investor can know it.
Imposing special processes on an investor, such as passing a test,
As an individual investor I am concerned that limiting my investment options is being considered.
Commodity ETFs, inverse ETFs, and leveraged ETFs are an important part of my investment strategy, both as defensive options in turbulent markets and as vehicles to enhance short to medium term trend investment strategies.
These investment vehicles should not be limited to use by high wealth
Dear Sir or Madam,
I am writing to you because I received a notice that I will be restricted to buy leveraged fund. I do not quite understand this decision because I am clear about what I am doing and understand the risk behind it.
Public investment should be available for everyone as long as they follow the rules and do not violate any regulations. I believe I have the rights to buy any
I not regulators should be able to choose the public
investments that are right for me and my family.
Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process
like passing a test before I can invest in public securities,
like leveraged and inverse funds. I am
capable of understanding
I should have the right to invest my money in any public investment I choose. I should not have to be tested or other unnecesssary requirements to purchase public investments.
I purchase these investment only when recommended by the investment new letter I follow, so they are a limited part of my investments.
When I invest in. Options I only use those at level 2, which is as high as the
I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. Like any normal thinking person, I am capable of understanding what leveraged and inverse funds can do as well as their risks. I do not need your restrictive limitations imposed on me.
I not you regulators should be able to choose the public
