Dear FINRA,
I am opposed to the potential restrictions by FINRA on my right to invest in public investments. I should be able to choose the investments that are right for me and my family. Publicly traded investments should be available to all the public and not just the privileged. I am more than capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks. I should not have to go
I have just learned from my brokers communication that FINRA is seeking public comments on restricting investors from buying a broad range of public securities designated as "complex products". I am an investor to handle my retirement accounts. It is very important for me to use as many tools as possible to protect my investments including inverse funds instruments for and
At any time after the Office of Hearing Officers serves the Respondent (or counsel representing the Respondent, or other person authorized to represent others under Rule 9141, when counsel or other person authorized to represent others under Rule 9141 agrees to accept service for the Respondent) with a temporary or permanent cease and desist order, a Party may apply to the Hearing Panel to
Short positions should have to report ALL accurate and up to date data. The amount of shares they have shorted. There should also be a T+0 system implace. It is not fair to the average investor (retail) that these major companies Like Citadel, can know in advance what is going on, compared to retail investors having a T+2 system. Equality in the stock market is what we should have. The naked
I would like for institutions to report naked shares and synthetic shares on a regular basis. The realistic option would be design a system that would not allow naked shorting. A system that would not even make it possible for them to naked short or sell synthetic shares. It puts retail traders at a disadvantage. On a side note, hedge funds are no longer needed. It's an outdated and
I am commenting on FINRA Regulatory Notice #22-08:
- FINRA's proposed limits may restrict my access to L&I Funds or disqualify me from trading L&I Funds or other "complex products".
- I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family with public investments available to everyone in the public.
- I have a strong
As a small business owner and someone who enjoys directing my own investments, I want to comment on the proposed regulation of leveraged and inverse funds. Leveraged funds make up a small, but important part, of my investment strategy. These funds are not difficult to understand nor are their potential risks and benefits. My investment strategy is conservative but leveraged funds give me an
I oppose any restrictions on my right to invest in public investments, including and not limited to leveraged funds.
I am the one to decide which investments are right for myself and my family. Public investments should be available to everyone, not just those someone considers privileged.
There should be no process to go through like passing a test, we don't need some bureaucrat. I am
I know what I'm doing with regard to my own investments. I should not have to jump through regulatory hoops to invest my own hard-earned money without significant regulation like "the big boys."
I shouldn't have to go through special processes like passing a test or demonstrating a high net worth to buy what I want with my own money. Ever. This sort of
Leveraged and inverse ETFs offer regular investors a safe way to invest in a wider variety of securities, achieve higher returns and meet financial goals faster. Without these instruments, achieving these returns would require investors to take risky short positions or margin trade, which are much riskier than being able to invest in these funds. My brokerage already has adequate warnings about
