Making this change will damage my future retirement plans and set me back indefinetly
We don't need the state meddling in our investments. I suspect this planned regulation is unconstitutional.
Leveraged ETFs have been helpful in my retirement planning. I am aware of their risks and limitations
as a long term investor in SH, I strongly object to plans to restrict investment leveraged and invest funds.
Do not close inverse and leveraged funds . Its important to the individual to be able to plan his retirement
Separate sales contests under NASD Rule 2820(g) for group variable annuity contracts and employer-sponsored retirement plans.
If you’re not careful, holiday expenses—including non-gift items and entertainment costs—can add up quickly. Follow these four steps to set a thorough holiday budget and keep spending under control.
The Liquidity Risk Management topic of the 2024 FINRA Annual Regulatory Oversight Report (the Report) informs member firms’ compliance programs by providing annual insights from FINRA’s ongoing regulatory operations, including (1) regulatory obligations and related considerations, (2) findings and effective practices, and (3) additional resources.
I dont agree with adding restrictions on public investments. I like having a variety of fund vehicles that allow me to tailor different parts of my family portfolio to best align with our plans. I am planning to use some of these vehicles to hedge retirement withdrawals, so we won't be hammered by reverse-dollar-cost-averaging. New restrictions will not prevent irresponsible individuals
I am heavily invested in leveraged products as part of my long term investment plan. I am only invested in etfs or etns which reflect indexes or sectors that I am confident will go up over the long term. I am ok with regulators asking investors about income or experience level, but there shouldn't be any sort of ban on leveraged products. We are adults and should have the legal right to
