Please do not impose new restrictions on trading leveraged funds that will effect our ability to continue trading the way we are now. For many people like myself and my family, leveraged funds are a very important part of our investment strategy. We do not feel that it is right to be restricted from trading them simply because we do not have a license, passed a test, or have a particular net
SUGGESTED ROUTINGSenior ManagementInternal AuditLegal & ComplianceRegistration Executive SummaryNational Association of Securities Dealers, Inc., (NASD®) rules require that members supervise each of their associated persons, regardless of their location, compensation arrangement, or registration status. This Notice addresses firm obligations to supervise associated persons
SUBMIT A PUBLIC COMMENT
- Leveraged and inverse funds are crucial to my investment strategies. As leverage and inverse funds, help me protect (hedge) my investments or seek enhanced returns with less risk (smaller dollars at risk), and I use them as a limited part of my overall portfolio.
- I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in
To whom it may concern,
I oppose restrictions on my right as a US citizen to invest in PUBLIC investments as this SEC Proposed Rule #S7-24-15 is trying to do. As an investor, I should be able to choose the investments that are right for me & my family. Public investments are just that - investments that need to be available to ALL of the public, not just those who have large
Please reconsider making any changes to the current regulations
for leveraged and inverse funds. I should be able to choose the
public investments that are right for me and my family. Public
investments should be available to all of the public, not just the
privileged.
I should not have to go through any special process,like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, leveraged and
I consider these proposed rules to be yet another abridgment of a citizen's right to do with his money what he chooses. I have half a century of experience in investing in stocks and bonds of all varieties. I learned how to do it the hard way, not by taking a test, but by self-study and experimenting with various instruments. I administered 2 employee pension plans as well as my own
Dear Sir, Mdm,
I want to make a clear statement about my need to be able to trade LEVERAGED AND INVERSE FUNDS. I am now able to buy a house, and pay for the education of my two children, thanks to my trading of the last years.
I believe I not regulators should be able to choose the public investments that are right for you and your family. Public investments should be available to all of the
I manage over $90 million in client assets. A major part of our risk management strategy is to buy up to 35% in inverse funds on the rare occasions the technicals are very bad. This only happens once every few years. We use a 10% stop, so our clients have a 3.5% risk (10% of 35%) to make gains/hedge when the markets make major corrections. This is explained to our clients initially, and at
- I am just a regular investor, I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.
- I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I invested in options years ago. I understand
Public investments should be available to ALL of the public, NOT just the PRIVILEGED few.....
All one has to do is read what is provided by the securities to know, understand what they offer... It is a joke, insult to think I would need to take a class, pass a test to try to make money with MY MONEY.......
When the market is DUMPING as it currently is its nice to make a few dollars, hedge my
