Investors should be allowed to invest in all types of securities. Investors should not be discriminated against based on investment balance or net worth and should not have to pass a test to be eligible for certain investments. Brokers, such as Schwab, Fidelity, and Robinhood, and investment product providers, such as Proshares, all do a great job of informing investors of the risks associated
The naked shorting and dark pool abuse that is going on has to stop if you want to call yourself any kind of regulatory agency. It is unthinkable that you allow retail investors to be stolen from by market makers, when it is your job to protect the sanctity of the system itself. Loss of confidence of an ENTIRE GENERATION of investors will likely cripple the US economic system and it will be due
I am writing because I appose the pending regulations restricting who can invest in leveraged and inverse funds and I oppose limitations on your investments.
The new rules and regulations are very unfair. These new regulations will deny me the freedom to choose investments that could help you achieve long-term financial security.
The new regulations are arbitrary. FINRAs definition of
I am writing because I appose the pending regulations restricting who can invest in leveraged and inverse funds and I oppose limitations on your investments. The new rules and regulations are very unfair. These new regulations will deny me the freedom to choose investments that could help you achieve long-term financial security. The new regulations are arbitrary. FINRAs definition of complex
Proposed Rule Change Relating to Alternative Trading System Volume and Trading Information
I as an educated investor want to make decisions on what I invest in. Public investments should be available to me and all the public not just the privileged.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities. I understand quite well what I am investing in when I purchase a leveraged or inverse fund. I understand the risk
It's really time for the "Big Brother" to move on from your ill advised attempt to save the peons from themselves.
If a person is not capable of making prudent decisions in their life, including what to invest in, is it the government's job in a democratic, free society to save them from their own stupidity? I think not and don't think that was the
Dear FINRA regulators,
I respectfully and strongly oppose further restrictions on my right to invest. Public securities should be something anyone in the public trading space should have free access to, regardless of income, occupation, net worth, or privilege. This includes leveraged and inverse funds, things I often use to hedge or trade in a tactical manner in my own portfolio. My volatility
Hello,
I feel it is extremely important to write to you regarding restrictions as to what my choices are to invest in. I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for myself and my family and those choices should include a broad spectrum of choices and not be limited by regulation.
Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged which has
My brokerage firm required me to listen to a statement detailing the potential risks for options before I could start trading them. Since options can similarly be used to achieve leverage or inverse returns, I think this is a reasonable requirement for trading in leveraged/inverse funds. At the end of the day, higher expected return comes hand in hand with greater risk. If a given investor isn
