I have been trading leveraged and inverse funds for some time now and should remain to be allowed to do so without further qualification. I am aware of the risk involved and, as a responsible investor, should not be subject to special tests or requirements to trade in these vehicles other than being aware of the risks involved. I do not think my access should be limited from any particular
Investing is the great equalizer that lets regular people achieve their own financial success. Adding more regulations stifle and restrict how those people are allowed to invest only limits their own freedom and ability to make that happen. A trade is an agreement between two parties, but these regulations are a third party - someone not even involved in that transaction - who feels they can
Hey you [REDACTED] - its my money that is hard earned and I have paid all taxes on it, now you better stop telling me what [REDACTED] I can or cannot do with it. [REDACTED] You [REDACTED] need to stay [REDACTED] out of my private financial business. I own tons of ETFs and they are all showing losses so Im holding on to them - if you want to change anything, make sure that you [REDACTED]
Please note that I do not support this regulation. Once again, unnecessary regulatory oversight will hinder lower net worth investors of money making opportunities. Assuming that high net worth individuals, or investors with significant time in grade equates to being a better investor just isnt true. Appropriate warnings on riskier investments is plenty of good faith effort to protect investors.
Hello, 1. I am poor because: 2. 2 of my kids graduated from Cornell with their masters. 3. My wife has spent the 1st 35 yrs of our marriage with a single digit credit score. Also: 4. My undergraduate is Finance, Masters in Atg, retired CPA 5. I was Investment Manager for with Osceola County. Portfolio size +- $100 million. Beat the state pool 8 of 10 yrs. Summary: I know my situation way better
I likely would fit all the criteria (VHNW, etc.) which I sort of sign off on for options trading at Fidelity yet I oppose this action. There are better ways to achieve investor protection without making them jump through hoops which in practice just turn out to be theatre.
I agree with extensive warning and labels to ward off uneducated investors. But regulator imposed tests, etc. are just
I AM STRONGLY OPPOSED TO THE PROPOSED NEW REGULATIONS CONCERNING LEVERAGED AND INVERSE FUNDS. THEY ARE AN EXCELLENT MEANS OF OBTAINING BETTER, ENHANCED RETURNS. I AM WELL AWARE OF THE RISKS INVOLVED. THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD NOT INTERFERE WITH THE PUBLIC'S RIGHT TO INVEST AS IT SEES FIT. THE GOVERNMENT MUST NOT INTERFERE WITH FREE ENTERPRISE. IT IS NOT A LEGITIMATE DUTY OF THE GOVERNMENT TO
I don't understand the rationale behind limiting what private party investors can invest in. if its my money and i signed that i read and understand the risks, why are you or anyone going to tell me i cant? this mentality flies in harmony with the idiotic thinking that congress votes Obama care for EVERYONE except themselves... or the vaccine is a mandate for everyone except them. we are way
I am completely opposed to this heavy handed big brother attitude. Were all of you ever children? Do you remember what it felt like to have someone think they were superior to you in their thinking and they commanded your actions like it or not? This is outrageous.
You do not have a superior knowledge that super cedes the rights of the rest of us. STOP this. Just remember, your current position
I oppose restrictions on the right of investors to invest in leveraged and inverse funds. It is important for investors to be able to freely choose their investments without the onerous burdens of having to clear regulatory hurdles. Each investor should have the right to decide for themselves how to best use public investments in achieving their goals. The more free choices of investments
