Dear FINRA:
I am very much opposed to restrictions on my right to invest. This is a great overreach making public investments available only to the privileged few and puts the small investor at a great disadvantage.
I am at the stage in life where I am longer able to work outside the home and plan to use investing to support myself in my later years.
Recently, I have learned how to use inverse
SUGGESTED ROUTING
Senior ManagementLegal & ComplianceOperations
Executive Summary
In the March 1, 1993, edition of the Federal Register, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) published notice of its intention to adopt Rule 15c6-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. This new rule would establish three, instead of five, business days as the standard settlement
I have invested and traded stocks, options, etf's for 20 years and understand the risks involved. I have a high net worth and only risk approximately 5% of my stock portfolio on options and etf's hedges. I have extensive knowledge by reading about various types of investments. This is the U.S. where we should have the right to invest public investments of all kinds if we choose
I am a very average investor and have been using leveraged and inverse ETFs to enhance returns for over a decade.
I don't want to have to go through training or pass a test in order to trade these funds and find it insulting that FINRA thinks so little of the general public that we're incapable of understanding the benefits and risks of leveraged and inverse ETFs.
Without
High risk/high return investment products should not be privileged to only the very wealthy. Index funds as such give smaller investors access to a wider array of investment tools. Trading the product requires buyers to fill out some extra paperwork demonstrating their understanding of the risk. Limiting the risk that smaller investors take on but not that of high net worth individuals seems anti
I oppose restrictions being placed on my right to choose and invest in stocks/bonds/annuities/funds/ETFs/crypto with my own resources as I see fit.
I have been investing for nearly 30 years, carefully researching the products I trade without relying on any particular broker nor adviser. I have recently added cryptocurrency assets, including BITO Proshares. I view this as an additional branch to
TO: All NASD Members and Level 2 and Level 3 Subscribers
On Tuesday, November 19, 1985, 18 issues are scheduled to join the NASDAQ National Market System, bringing the total number of issues in NASDAQ/NMS to 2,172. These 18 issues, which will begin trading under real-time trade reporting, are entering the NASDAQ/NMS pursuant to the Securities and Exchange Commission's criteria for
I work at an ocio and have the cfa. So coming from that background LETFs are not something that one stumbles into. There is enough info on the web that details the advantages and risks. Reddit LETFs, boggleheads forum, and portfolio visualizer have enough discussion of risks and advantages of these products. There is a lot of interest in these products from retail following the HFEA strategy upro
Thank you for your time. I've gotten into investing over the last 5 months as an individual with limited funds. I've learned to responsibly utilize leveraged and inverse ETFs and they have become a crucial part of my trading strategy. For someone like me, it allows greater exposure in the market with less funds. Also, inverse tools make the most sense in a bear market which we
This proposed regulation only inhibits free markets. Short selling or inverse ETFs were banned back in the 2008 collapse and simply equated to a rigged market. Why don't you regulate the purchase of long position shares when the market goes up too quickly? The only throttle considered is on the down side, which could be used to hedge other positions and/or anticipate and profit from
