It should be every individual investors right to choose the public investments. Leveraged ETFs should not be an exception. And the leveraged ETFs provide a more intuitive method for the general public to hedge the total portfolio and enhance the total return. If regulator limits individual investors right to choose leveraged ETFs as the investment tools, this action feels like strongly in
I oppose restrictions on the right of investors to invest in leveraged and inverse funds. It is important for investors to be able to freely choose their investments without the onerous burdens of having to clear regulatory hurdles. Each investor should have the right to decide for themselves how to best use public investments in achieving their goals. The more free choices of investments
I as an investor of my own money that I earned should be able to choose the investments that are right for me and my family.
There should never be two standards for investments for those who have exorbitant wealth, and those who don't. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.
I have used TTT to make good ROI and now that is threatened because
I think restricting access to leveraged & inverse products is a terrible idea. These are useful products for everyone from small retail investors to big institutions. Passing restrictions will simply create a system where it's even harder for someone trying to create wealth to do so, whereas someone who already has wealth can accelerate its accumulation. E.g. you will be
Yes i understand the risk of the fund, and i am happy to invest, it is very directly, the fund is using leveage, in a nut shell borrowing money to invest more, and is mananged to pay the cost of the loan and to also provide extra growth. It is a good system, and their needs to be more funds like this. In fact many Real Estate investments work on the same concept. Leverage, the 8th wonder of the
Why is this happening now? Is the economy about to crash and you do not want the average person have the ability to protect their wealth? This stinks of yet more elitism in a system that is solely designed to protect the ultra rich. The rich already have the ability to invest in companies before an IPO, leaving little value for the average person, as one example, so in an unstable economy you
REQUEST FOR COMMENTFairness Opinions Issued by MembersComment Period Expires: January 10, 2005Note: The comment period was extended to February 1, 2005.SUGGESTED ROUTINGKEY TOPICSLegal & ComplianceOperationsSenior ManagementFairness OpinionsInvestment Banks Mergers and AcquisitionsProxy StatementsExecutive SummaryNASD is requesting comment on whether it should propose a new rule
(a) Standards for Admission
After considering the application, the membership interview, other information and documents provided by the Applicant, other information and documents obtained by the Department, and the public interest and the protection of investors, the Department shall determine whether the Applicant meets each of the following standards:
(1) The application and all supporting
(a) Standards for Admission
After considering the application, the membership interview, other information and documents provided by the Applicant, other information and documents obtained by the Department, and the public interest and the protection of investors, the Department shall determine whether the Applicant meets each of the following standards:
(1) The application and all supporting
This rule is no longer applicable. NASD Rule 1010 Series has been superseded by FINRA Rule 1000 Series. Please consult the appropriate FINRA Rule.
(a) Standards for Admission
After considering the application, the membership interview, other information and documents provided by the Applicant, other information and documents obtained by the Department, and the public interest and the protection
