I don't understand the rationale behind limiting what private party investors can invest in. if its my money and i signed that i read and understand the risks, why are you or anyone going to tell me i cant? this mentality flies in harmony with the idiotic thinking that congress votes Obama care for EVERYONE except themselves... or the vaccine is a mandate for everyone except them. we are way
I am completely opposed to this heavy handed big brother attitude. Were all of you ever children? Do you remember what it felt like to have someone think they were superior to you in their thinking and they commanded your actions like it or not? This is outrageous.
You do not have a superior knowledge that super cedes the rights of the rest of us. STOP this. Just remember, your current position
I oppose restrictions on the right of investors to invest in leveraged and inverse funds. It is important for investors to be able to freely choose their investments without the onerous burdens of having to clear regulatory hurdles. Each investor should have the right to decide for themselves how to best use public investments in achieving their goals. The more free choices of investments
I, like most Americans I see and speak with every day, have already had more than a lifetime's worth of interference from government do-gooders who think they know better than I do what it good for me.
Small family businesses and free individuals are the backbone of America. Get big business and big government out of our way. You can start by skipping the implementation of imbecilic
Dear FINRA,
While it is understandable that you have the interest of investors on mind, it is not fair to restrict investment opportunities to accredited investors and high net worth individuals. This will end up in rich getting richer and poor staying poor. Retail investors do educate themselves before picking investments whether stocks ETFs or leveraged products. Definitely better than gambling
I AM STRONGLY OPPOSED TO THE PROPOSED NEW REGULATIONS CONCERNING LEVERAGED AND INVERSE FUNDS. THEY ARE AN EXCELLENT MEANS OF OBTAINING BETTER, ENHANCED RETURNS. I AM WELL AWARE OF THE RISKS INVOLVED. THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD NOT INTERFERE WITH THE PUBLIC'S RIGHT TO INVEST AS IT SEES FIT. THE GOVERNMENT MUST NOT INTERFERE WITH FREE ENTERPRISE. IT IS NOT A LEGITIMATE DUTY OF THE GOVERNMENT TO
I am an individual investor and I make my own investment decisions, including the use of leveraged funds. I have previously used and still use leveraged funds to achieve better investment returns in market segments that I think will rise in value. I neither need nor want the federal government making those decisions for me. It is not the purpose of the federal government to regulate my ability to
We as investors should have the freedom to invest at our risk tolerance level. The fact is simple. All adults in this country can freely go to casinos, where their losses are almost certain. Why can't we invest in leveraged products which have much better chance to grow our net worth. Also, leveraged and inversed products are important in my investment strategy--grow my assets faster in an
Dear FINRA, the fundamental question you should ask is this: "Are you, as an investor, competent enough to make your own investment decisions (whether they are "complex" or otherwise)"? If one answer's this question as "Yes" then FINRA should have no further involvement. If one answers this question as "No" then FINRA, at most, should recommend sources
Leveraged ETFs allow ordinary investors to tap into opportunities previously only accessible to the most wealthy, through managed funds.
Its been a game changer. Its available to those that wish to use them. Why regulate such a thing? Allow people to manage their money as they see fit.
While youre at it, lets allow folks to manage their social security funds as well. Ok. Make a list of
