Proposed Rule Change to Amend Section 4(c) of Schedule A to the FINRA By-Laws to Increase Qualification Examination Fees and Assess a Service Charge for Regulatory Element Continuing Education Sessions Taken Outside the United States
we have lost faith in the markets , Transparency is very important . Please help us . short sellers are ruling the markets and have full control over it .
I do not wish to have regulations impose on my rights to invest. This proposed Rule will be violating my constitutional right to chose once again! You chose to focus on those you continue to pass funds to bailout! Companies that have mismanaged their funds.
Your proposal is treating investors like children. I am opposed to ptoposed rule S7-24-15. I have a PhD in business administration and am capable of deciding my own investment strategy without the hoops you propose for investors to jump through.
I absolutely oppose the new restrictions proposed in SEC Rule S7-24-15. This is another example of government over-reach. Stop it. Now! Let all the little guys in this country continue to do what has made this country the greatest free market in the world!
There is no transparency within the market. End Dark pools. Strictly enforce SSR Enforce FTDs without delay. Make everyone, not some, play by the rules properly
Proposed Rule Change Extending the Pilot Period Regarding the Use of Multiple MPIDs on FINRA Facilities
We want T-0 settlement. We want transparency. We want jail time and not fines for breaking rules. We want a fair stock market.
NASDR has filed with the SEC a proposed rule change to create a dispute resolution subsidiary, NASD Dispute Resolution, Inc. ("NASD Dispute Resolution"), to handle dispute resolution programs; to adopt by-laws for such subsidiary; and to make conforming amendments to the Delegation Plan, the NASD Regulation By-Laws, and the Rules of the Association.
