Why on earth would a "regulatory agency" restrict the financial movements of the citizens they allegedly claim to protect? Better said, why do we have these regulatory agencies in the first place? You are restricting the movement of American people to prosper and invest as we see best. WE are responsible for our spending, our investing, and our losses. Keep your sticky fingers
Stop this movement thats against the pursuit of happiness and the constitutional right at a way to acquire the American dream. Stop this push to take away any hope in an effort for growth and make ones world better. Its really sad to have to write like this, its shouldnt have to even be an issue! We do not need or accept these measures planed to impose on me or anyone else. Measures like this is
I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. I should not be forced to go through a specific test to be able to trade any securities I want. As an individual I am capable of making my own decisions. Cryptocurrency strategy is important for my long term financial planning
Trading has recently become accessible to the public via apps in a way it has never been accessible in the past, and I believe that this broad access should continue to be available to all presently qualified people - for better or worse. The burden of responsibility ultimately falls on the individual to understand the risks of their actions and make decisions accordingly, whether it be in
Please don't end or restrict our access to leveraged and inverse etf's. These etf's constitute an important part of many of our portfolios. Would you be making these changes because of perceived risk? These funds are FAR less risky than buying and selling options. Let us determine what investments are appropriate for us and our unique circumstances. Restricting
The freedom to invest in a variety of financial products is paramount for those choosing this as a profession. Diverse investing is how many people make a living.
As with any form of employment, some excel and others find through experience they prefer other options. Not having choice would be disruptive to many livelihoods.
Like other jobs people get better through practice and pay taxes on
The federal government has no right to dictate what investments should be made and when. Account minimums, investor accreditation and other measures that bar people with net worths lower than those deemed "acceptable" is not at all what this country was founded on. DO NOT TAKE MY INVESTMENTS. Investments in cryptocurrency are investments in the future, just as buying Apple stock
The ability to trade inverse and leveraged investment vehicles as well as closed end funds, volatility assets, stocks bonds and options are all equally important to me personally! Regulators should not be able to determine what I as a long term sophisticated investor should be able to trade. There is no reason to make me subject to any special process or approvals, I have been using them for a
a. Public investments should be able to all of the public, not just the privileged
b. I am well capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds together with the risks and certainly don't need special tests / process to pass before we can invest in these types of securities.
c. Leveraged and inverse funds are important to my investment strategies.
d. It is better that regulators
I've used leveraged and inverse ETFs for decades now with no issues and I strongly oppose restriction of their use. If you are going to start choosing what public investments can and can not be made by individual investors, you will have to lay out a clear rationale for each decision and that will highly likely be perceived as arbitrary leading to multiple issues for you. If your goal
