Leveraged and inverse funds are important part of my investment strategies. I believe in long term dividend holdings and use leverage and inverse funds to help protect portions of my investments. I shouldn't have to go through any specialized processes like taking a test or proving my investment knowledge.
I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds along with there risks.
Leveraged and inverse funds are important part of my investment strategies. I believe in long term dividend holdings and use leverage and inverse funds to help protect portions of my investments. I shouldn't have to go through any specialized processes like taking a test or proving my investment knowledge.
I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds along with there risks.
I use leverage investments to provide added income for my family. I use it responsibly without margin and limit my exposure to a very small percentage of my portfolio.
I would be fine if there are more restrictions that include knowledge base learning tools and accepting the added risk characteristics that are involved with such investments. I do not feel it is necessary to take them away as a
I would like to let you know I fell that "Public Investments" should live up to their name and be open to the "Public". I am more than capable of understanding leveraged & inverse funds and their risks. I do not need an investment babysitter or any restrictions imposed that is going to make it any more difficult for me to get a good return on my
Every investment carries a level of risk. While leveraged and inverse ETPs might not be well known to most retail traders, those who know about these products tend to understand how they work and how to use them. Prohibiting adults from purchasing a leveraged index fund when there are people losing money on riskier assets like cryptocurrencies and non-fungible tokens is ridiculous.
I have used ProShares ETF's for years. My best investment with them is SSO. I have a large gain in that. I am very familiar with the risks of their products. I do know from experience how to use them after years of using their product. I would NOT like to see their products be put into a category of "complex products" and not be able to invest in them. Please do not do
Dear FINRA
Do not take away our ability to invest/trade leveraged and inverse ETFs. I understand the risk and I use it for hedging. Also remember, long term returns of DIA:TNA, SPY:UPRO, QQQ:TQQQ are approximately 1:3 as expected.
At least do not take away the rights to trade these. Broad Index based leveraged and inverse ETFs in due course are not risky. Please look at the data.
I oppose establishment of restrictions upon individuals to make investments as described in the proposed rule, #S7-24-15. While I support providing individuals with opinions and recommendations, restrictions intrude on decisions best made by individuals who weigh risk vs reward of investments made with their money.
Specific to crypto, individuals need no more restrictions than alternate
I am against imposing regulations on my ability to invest in inverse and leveraged funds. I have invested in such funds and realize the risk involved and understand the basics of how they work. Imposing regulations on these funds sets a very very dangerous precedent. What will you regulate next? I don't need some government bureaucracy trying to protect me from myself. That is NOT the role
Please do not regulate LETFs anymore than they already are. Retail investors should have access to them. We can understand risks and evaluate them just as well as institutional investors and determine our own allocations towards LETFs, if we do see fit.
Please do not add unnecessary regulations. Please keep the market fair and open to everyone.
