Please, please do NOT impose the proposed new FINRA regulations. As an active investor I am practically regulated out of the marketplace, and am still suffering the damage caused by the Dodd-Frank Act. The last thing we private citizens need is more government interference in our lives, which invariable harms rather than helps. The amount of trouble and stress for regular people like me that
So let me get this right. The Fed in pandering to the Democrat Party Mob and the crippling spending they have engaged in, and somewhat to those never pick a fight Republicans, has created a huge mess and the one thing that helps a person not loose in the market day after day, is reserved for the fat cats that made the mess. The whole idea of the Fed, a private bank, was to prevent situations like
Investors not regulators – should be able to choose the public investments that are right for you and your family.
Public investments should be available to all of the public,not just the privileged.
You shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before you can invest in public securities. We are aware of our own risks and it continues to baffle me and others
Hey you [REDACTED] - its my money that is hard earned and I have paid all taxes on it, now you better stop telling me what [REDACTED] I can or cannot do with it. [REDACTED] You [REDACTED] need to stay [REDACTED] out of my private financial business. I own tons of ETFs and they are all showing losses so Im holding on to them - if you want to change anything, make sure that you [REDACTED]
Please stop telling small private investors what they can and cant invest in; our money is green like everyone elses and if we want to take the added risk of leveraged investments we should be able to accept that risk and do so. Requiring accredited investor status is particularly egregious as it excludes 90+% of investors. Its 2022, people are more educated about investing than ever and we need
I don't understand the rationale behind limiting what private party investors can invest in. if its my money and i signed that i read and understand the risks, why are you or anyone going to tell me i cant? this mentality flies in harmony with the idiotic thinking that congress votes Obama care for EVERYONE except themselves... or the vaccine is a mandate for everyone except them. we are way
To whom it may concern I am writing to request that I be able on my own behalf have the ability to buy and sell shares on my own , I have a great concept on how to do this and want the ability to retain the options on my own behalf to do so , I believe you should not interfere in private investors ability to do so , this is not good for interference from the government to do so. Thanks for you
I, not regulators, should be able independently to choose public investments which are best for me and my family. I should not be required to go through a special process such as passing a test to invest in securities such as leveraged and inverse funds. I as a private investor have sufficient understanding of the workings risks of such funds, and have enjoyed over 20 years of investing in such
I am a small private investor with a great deal of experience however I might not measure up to your new strict standards.That concerns me as I use these investments as short term hedging vehicles. I shouldn't have to go through a special process to qualify, what brokerages have in place now is very adequate. Your proposed new rules would make these products the exclusive trading grounds of
I believe that I should have the right to choose how & where I invest, not some regulator who restricts my investment choices, and I shouldn't have to go through any special process before I can invest in public securities, such as inverse funds. I am fully capable of understanding inverse funds and I don't want or need to have these draconian measures imposed on me. Inverse