I fully oppose restricting freedom to invest and creating obstacles for retail investors to interact with "complex products". If the intention is to protect people's finance, instead of taking the lazy path of restriction, a better way would be to educate. Majority of retail investors understand the risk they are taking by entering the markets, and creating a silo for the "
I not regulators should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks
I not regulators should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities. I am more than capable of understanding my investments and their risks and I do not
Dear Sirs,
I would like to continue to be able to pick my investments as they correct for my family and my investment needs. I do not agree that further regulation of Leveraged and Inverse Funds is needed. I understand the risks. These funds help me hedge against sudden and dramatic reversals in my investments Please allow me to continue to choose these funds unhindered Thank you for your
Completely unfair - the public should be able to take whatever risk they see fit without being subject to excessive requirements. These rules would literally be limiting the public's access to high-risk/high-ROI investments for little reason. There should be tools available to anyone who is interested in going beyond traditional investing (i.e. daytrading, speculation, etc.). Adding
Public Investments should be between the investor and the financial firm associated. The risks associated with investing are well known and explained by financial firms. Personal investments and retirement plans are controlled by the investor and investment retirement planners and critical to the investment success and well being of all. Based on Historical experience, especially lately,
I am an experienced investor who is aware of how ETFs and inverse type funds work. Like any other investment there is due diligence and risk, which I accept. I dont think FINRA should over reach and and limit availability and access to these instruments. Instead, they should focus more in investor education, especially to younger generations that are crafting their investment strategies, and not
Not regulators-I should be able to choose the public investment that are right for me and mine family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. I do not have to go thru any special process like passing an exam before I can buy public securities. I am capable of understanding mine investments and their risks. I do not need terrible mesures, imposed on
To whom it may concern.
Leveraged ETFs have been an important part of my investing strategy for years. I am aware of the risks and the benefits to my overall investment goals. I have used them to consistently outperform professional mangers.
It is unfair that you would take the public's right to participate in the market and restrict it to the privileged. Please let us continue to
As an adult who is competent enough to open a brokerage account and make trades, I should have the freedom to make any investment that meets the risk tolerance I deem acceptable. You, the regulators, don't understand my position or needs as an investor and as such are not qualified to direct me how to invest my money. Stop wasting my time and tax dollars by trying to restrict my
