I oppose restrictions to my right to invest. For many years, I have been studying about complex investments in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds, and feel confident of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks. I have been successfully using them to seek enhanced returns and building wealth. I don't need regulators to put restrictions on my right to
Dear Sir/Madam:
I am adamantly opposed to the restrictions proposed with regard to leveraged and inverse funds. I have owned one for years, and am totally aware of the risks involved. It has also been one of my best investments.
I am extremely concerned that these measures will hamper liquidity of the investment I already have, as well as restrict the ability of buying similar products in the
I am writing to express my opposition to increase regulation limiting the use and trading of reverse and leveraged securities. While these can represent a higher risk form of investing, they can also be an effective way for ordinary and yet well informed investors to navigate different trends and market environments. Efforts to limi this type of investing to the privileged few does not benefit
I am opposed to restrictions on my ability to trade in publicly traded hedge or derivative funds.
I am of age and use these types of investments as a very small part of our family investments, but they allow me to participate in the market during economic periods of change without liquidating my long-term holdings.
A simple and straightforward note or warning would be sufficient to alert
Investors should be allowed to invest how and when they would like. We all know there are risks in any investment, and as long as there are rules that are enforced to make it an even playground, the SEC should not be the "parent" telling adults how to invest their funds.
Maybe not allow Politicians who have insider knowledge invest in stocks that they can manipulate with notices
You have no right to restrictions. I will pull all my money and others might do so. Then, where are you going to apply your restrictions? I have right to choose and do what is the best for me and not just to only the privileged. You REGULATORS sound as lobbyist. I am capable to understand leverage and inverse funds and their risks and do not like to be impose. I have been in investment long
I am very disappointed with the proposal to restrict my ability to buy leveraged and inversed fund. I am perfectly capable of educating myself about those instruments and I don't need to pass any special test. I am using these instruments to reduce risk and they are very beneficial to my portfolio strategy. I hope you would not enact any restrictions on purchasing those instruments by
Public Investments should be between the investor and the financial firm associated. The risks associated with investing are well known and explained by financial firms. Personal investments and retirement plans are controlled by the investor and investment retirement planners and critical to the investment success and well being of all. Based on Historical experience, especially lately,
I am an experienced investor who is aware of how ETFs and inverse type funds work. Like any other investment there is due diligence and risk, which I accept. I dont think FINRA should over reach and and limit availability and access to these instruments. Instead, they should focus more in investor education, especially to younger generations that are crafting their investment strategies, and not
I am an experienced investor who is aware of how ETFs and inverse type funds work. Like any other investment there is due diligence and risk, which I accept. I dont think FINRA should over reach and and limit availability and access to these instruments. Instead, they should focus more in investor education, especially to younger generations that are crafting their investment strategies, and
