Public Investments should be between the investor and the financial firm associated. The risks associated with investing are well known and explained by financial firms. Personal investments and retirement plans are controlled by the investor and investment retirement planners and critical to the investment success and well being of all. Based on Historical experience, especially lately,
I am an experienced investor who is aware of how ETFs and inverse type funds work. Like any other investment there is due diligence and risk, which I accept. I dont think FINRA should over reach and and limit availability and access to these instruments. Instead, they should focus more in investor education, especially to younger generations that are crafting their investment strategies, and not
Not regulators-I should be able to choose the public investment that are right for me and mine family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. I do not have to go thru any special process like passing an exam before I can buy public securities. I am capable of understanding mine investments and their risks. I do not need terrible mesures, imposed on
To whom it may concern.
Leveraged ETFs have been an important part of my investing strategy for years. I am aware of the risks and the benefits to my overall investment goals. I have used them to consistently outperform professional mangers.
It is unfair that you would take the public's right to participate in the market and restrict it to the privileged. Please let us continue to
As an adult who is competent enough to open a brokerage account and make trades, I should have the freedom to make any investment that meets the risk tolerance I deem acceptable. You, the regulators, don't understand my position or needs as an investor and as such are not qualified to direct me how to invest my money. Stop wasting my time and tax dollars by trying to restrict my
I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I am capable understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks. I do not
I have been a long term investor in leveraged products for more than 12 years. I am a responsible and an educated investor with these type of investments. My broker, TD Ameritrade provides a warning every time an order for leveraged/inverse investment is made. These are not Meme stocks or high risk options that need any sort of regulation. In fact, meme stocks and options are the ones that need
Leveraged and Inverse Funds are a large part of my investment choices. I know what I am investing in. I know the risks. It's my decision to invest in Leveraged and/or Inverse Funds whether I make or lose money. It simply doesn't make sense to limit one of their ability to make money for themselves and their family. Regulators do not know my personal situation or my investment
You have no right to restrictions. I will pull all my money and others might do so. Then, where are you going to apply your restrictions? I have right to choose and do what is the best for me and not just to only the privileged. You REGULATORS sound as lobbyist. I am capable to understand leverage and inverse funds and their risks and do not like to be impose. I have been in investment long
I am very disappointed with the proposal to restrict my ability to buy leveraged and inversed fund. I am perfectly capable of educating myself about those instruments and I don't need to pass any special test. I am using these instruments to reduce risk and they are very beneficial to my portfolio strategy. I hope you would not enact any restrictions on purchasing those instruments by