Please leave leveraged and inverse ETFs in tact. They allow simple investors like myself buy and sell simple ETFs like stock without having to do complex short trades or PUTS&CALLS which require more sophisticated trading knowledge. The ETFs work very well and simply for average investor. We realize the risk and losses are contained by broker if necessary. Thank you.
I am a highly educated adult with decades of trading and investing experience including venture capital and angel investing. Don't pretend that your regulations are protecting me. I fully understand the risks and am prepared for potential loss. Get out of my hair and let me go make money. The leveraged investment vehicles happen to be working incredibly well for me. Freedom America, not
Although I don't disagree with some regulation, I do have a hard time accepting restriction from investing in funds or stocks that I deem are acceptable to my risk appetite. If the regulation proposed would eliminate my access to these funds that I have the ability to research prior to any investment, I strongly oppose it. If the regulation would require that my investment vehicles be
Retail investors need to have the right to invest and I oppose any restrictions on my right to invest. I completely understand the leveraged and inverse funds and their risk and are extremely important for my investment strategies, which I use for my portfolio. Any change made here on the right to invest is extremely concerning for me as a retail investor and I need these tools to use in future
I oppose any restrictions on my investment selections. There must be no barriers on what I invest in and how I invest in it. I understand the risks associated with leveraged/inverse funds, and I choose to invest in them as a very important subset of my diversified retirement portfolio. It is important to investors like myself to be able to trade it without any restrictions. Please do not
All public investments should be available to all citizens. The trouble is the descriptions.
A public investment should have TWO publicly available descriptors of the investment. One is the "traditional" huge info dump which admittedly presents comprehension issues to novices. So, add a SECOND discription, dumbed down to the important numbers (risk probabilities, etc.) for the
All Stocks, ETF's, Funds or other investments are all subject to investment risk regardless of there class or structure. The choice is mine when making investment choices and must not be subject to Regulator involvement. The rules now on investment trading are already restrictive to a large degree.
Where were the Regulators when my pension was frozen during Company bankruptcy. Please
To whom it may concern, not sure why Im receiving this but I should be able to buy whatever I want with my money. I have been following the market for 20 years Not sure what the problem is but I control what I buy and sell. I understand leveraged funds and risks. This is very important for individuals to buy and sell. This is the stock market right? I use these to hedge my investments. Please
I don't think it is fair to regulate inverse and leveraged funds, since I rely on these as an important strategy. Especially inverse funds gives a "common" investor the ability to profit if the market goes down.
I understand the risks, and I accept gains and losses, just as I do with purchasing stocks and bonds.
In a free market, it is important to allow the market (of
As a 50 year investor worth almost 2 million in assets, I use inverse and leveraged ETFs on zero to 15% of my investments based on market conditions. I use inverse sprangling in ultra Bear markets . I currently am in inverses for the 1st time in 14 years because the markets are so negative. And I know all about the risks . The examples of mistracking by FNRA is rare and over blown
