I disagree with restricting my free and equitable access to leveraged and inverse funds.
Trying to limit the access of investors to leveraged and inverse funds will further put the individual investor at disadvantage against big institutions.
These funds have been there for years and are part of many investor's strategies (e.g. hedging risk).
Another point to consider is that restricting
Comments:Not entirely sure what motivation is being sold here, but it's quite obvious to me this will lead to further exploitation of the portion of the investing population without the means to clear the substantial hurdles being erected.
Without equal access to hedging and investing tools available to others, one can expect illicit shortcuts, scams, crypto, NFTs and illegal investment
The increasing restrictions on regular individuals is impeding entrepreneurship and small businesses in this country and favoring big corporations, whales, and ultra rich. Limiting the tools for the average person isn't helpful. This isn't only evident in this proposition but also in your limitations on crypto companies like FTX etc... I suggest you place a warning in clear and big and
Keep your hands off of our crypto wallets! We refrain from the need to regulate how we invest our own money. Mind your business and manage your own home funds how you please and we will continue to do the same, without any of you meddling in our family affairs. We have and deserve to continue to have the right to FREELY manage the growth and expansion of OUR WEALTH just as we please. So retract
I oppose the proposed restrictions on leveraged and inverse funds. I am already an accredited investor and my use of leveraged funds make up only a tiny portion of my net worth. I understand the risks and see no reason to restrict access to these and other products. They are already inherently less risky than other readily available products like options, crypto, certain poorly run private
MUST KEEP MARKETS FREE AND OPEN.OR ITS IMPOSSIBLE TO MAKE BUSINESSES MOVE, THIS INABILITY TO OPERATE AND BUY AND SELL COMPLETELY TAXLESS WHAT IS PRIVATE PROPERTY NEEDS TO STOP. BY TRYING TO CONTROL THIS YOUR KILLING A VERY GOLDEN GOOSE WHICH EXPANDS EVERYONES CAPACITY TO HAVE A BIGGER PIECE OF A BIGGER PIE
EVERYONE WINS BY TAKING TAXATION OUT OF ALL CRYPTO EQUATIONS, WE PAY ANY INTEREST TROUGH A
Enough with the restrictions, I should be able to choose which segments I wish to invest in. Data is todays new form of currency and Crypto related segments are 1) tech driven, 2) tied to trove of data 3) at a min a Fund like BITO is managed so the diversification is built in even though its a speculative emerging market.
If you start limiting these things then why let investors invest with
Cryptocurrency and crypto currency funds should not be limited to qualified investors. It is the duty of all investors to understand the what they are investing in and the risks involved. Closing off retail investors from an entire class of assets would be a disservice and over reach. As this sector of the economy grows and evolves it is on all of those investing to research and understand what
In response to the threat of regulations regarding cryptocurrency, I would like to say any regulations enforced equals freedom weakened or even loss. Our government needs to downsize , as it is too big and wasteful. Crypto is NOT property of the government nor does it compete to acquire the next bitcoin like the bitcoin miners do. It is a code generated by the blockchain as a reward for
The Manipulative Trading topic of the 2024 FINRA Annual Regulatory Oversight Report (the Report) informs member firms’ compliance programs by providing annual insights from FINRA’s ongoing regulatory operations, including (1) regulatory obligations and related considerations, (2) findings and effective practices, and (3) additional resources.
